Bad Characters: Imperceptible NLP Attacks
Nicholas Boucher, Ilia Shumailov, Ross Anderson, Nicolas Papernot
Abstract
Several years of research have shown that machine-learning systems are vulnerable to adversarial examples, both in theory and in practice. Until now, such attacks have primarily targeted visual models, exploiting the gap between human and machine perception. Although text-based models have also been attacked with adversarial examples, such attacks struggled to preserve semantic meaning and indistinguishability. In this paper, we explore a large class of adversarial examples that can be used to attack text-based models in a black-box setting without making any human-perceptible visual modification to inputs. We use encoding-specific perturbations that are imperceptible to the human eye to manipulate the outputs of a wide range of Natural Language Processing (NLP) systems from neural machine-translation pipelines to web search engines. We find that with a single imperceptible encoding injection – representing one invisible character, homoglyph, reordering, or deletion – an attacker can significantly reduce the performance of vulnerable models, and with three injections most models can be functionally broken. Our attacks work against currently-deployed commercial systems, including those produced by Microsoft and Google, in addition to open source models published by Facebook, IBM, and HuggingFace. This novel series of attacks presents a significant threat to many language processing systems: an attacker can affect systems in a targeted manner without any assumptions about the underlying model. We conclude that text-based NLP systems require careful input sanitization, just like conventional applications, and that given such systems are now being deployed rapidly at scale, the urgent attention of architects and operators is required.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 3b99e942-9bdc-4095-aaab-b4c8c06c7495Cited by top-tier papers35
- A Watermark for Large Language ModelsJohn Kirchenbauer, Jonas Geiping, Yuxin Wen, Jonathan Katz et al.ICML 2023 · 854 citations
- "Do Anything Now": Characterizing and Evaluating In-The-Wild Jailbreak Prompts on Large Language ModelsXinyue Shen, Zeyuan Chen, Michael Backes, Yun Shen et al.CCS 2024 · 132 citations
- Unbiased Watermark for Large Language ModelsZhengmian Hu, Lichang Chen, Xidong Wu, Yihan Wu et al.ICLR 2024 · 103 citations
- Training-free Lexical Backdoor Attacks on Language ModelsYujin Huang, Terry Yue Zhuo, Qiongkai Xu, Han Hu et al.WWW 2023 · 56 citations
- ChatInject: Abusing Chat Templates for Prompt Injection in LLM AgentsHwan Chang, Yonghyun Jun, Hwanhee LeeICLR 2026 · 32 citations
Builds on5
- TextBugger: Generating Adversarial Text Against Real-world ApplicationsJinfeng Li, Shouling Ji, Tianyu Du, Bo Li et al.NDSS 2019 · 876 citations
- Manipulating Machine Learning: Poisoning Attacks and Countermeasures for Regression LearningMatthew Jagielski, Alina Oprea, Battista Biggio, Chang Liu et al.S&P 2018 · 867 citations
- Label-Only Membership Inference AttacksChristopher A. Choquette-Choo, Florian Tramèr, Nicholas Carlini, Nicolas PapernotICML 2021 · 628 citations
- Terminal Brain Damage: Exposing the Graceless Degradation in Deep Neural Networks Under Hardware Fault AttacksSanghyun Hong, Pietro Frigo, Yigitcan Kaya, Cristiano Giuffrida et al.USENIX Security 2019 · 255 citations
- A Reinforced Generation of Adversarial Examples for Neural Machine TranslationWei Zou, Shujian Huang, Jun Xie, Xinyu Dai et al.ACL 2020 · 66 citations
Related papers
- How do humans perceive adversarial text? A reality check on the validity and naturalness of word-based adversarial attacksSalijona Dyrmishi, Salah Ghamizi, Maxime CordyACL 2023 · 4 citations
- A Targeted Attack on Black-Box Neural Machine Translation with Parallel Data PoisoningChang Xu, Jun Wang, Yuqing Tang, Francisco Guzmán et al.WWW 2021 · 37 citations
- "That Is a Suspicious Reaction!": Interpreting Logits Variation to Detect NLP Adversarial AttacksEdoardo Mosca, Shreyash Agarwal, Javier Rando-Ramirez, Georg GrohACL 2022 · 43 citations
- Hidden Backdoors in Human-Centric Language ModelsShaofeng Li, Hui Liu, Tian Dong, Benjamin Zi Hao Zhao et al.CCS 2021 · 108 citations
- Are aligned neural networks adversarially aligned?Nicholas Carlini, Milad Nasr, Christopher A. Choquette-Choo, Matthew Jagielski et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 412 citations
