A Behavioural and Representational Evaluation of Goal-Directedness in Language Model Agents
Raghu Arghal, Fade Chen, Niall Dalton, Evgenii Kortukov, Calum McNamara, Angelos Nalmpantis, Moksh Nirvaan, Gabriele Sarti, Mario Giulianelli
Abstract
Understanding an agent's goals helps explain and predict its behaviour, yet there is no established methodology for reliably attributing goals to agentic systems. We propose a framework for evaluating goal-directedness that integrates behavioural evaluation with interpretability-based analyses of models' internal representations. As a case study, we examine an LLM agent navigating a 2D grid world toward a goal state. Behaviourally, we evaluate the agent against optimal policies across varying grid sizes, obstacle densities, and goal structures, finding that performance scales with task difficulty while remaining robust to difficulty-preserving transformations and multi-goal structures. We then use probing methods to decode internal representations of the environment and multi-step action plans. We find that the LLM agent non-linearly encodes a coarse spatial map, preserving approximate task-relevant cues about its position and the goal location; that its actions are broadly consistent with these internal representations; and that reasoning reorganises them, shifting from spatial cues toward immediate action selection. Our findings support the view that introspective examination is required beyond behavioural evaluations to characterise how agents represent and pursue their objectives.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 3adea482-d62a-4428-bcd5-1ee1cdb3d0c5Builds on13
- Language Models Represent Space and TimeWes Gurnee, Max TegmarkICLR 2024 · 303 citations
- The Alignment Problem from a Deep Learning PerspectiveRichard Ngo, Lawrence Chan, Sören MindermannICLR 2024 · 296 citations
- Utility Engineering: Analyzing and Controlling Emergent Value Systems in AIsMantas Mazeika, Xuwang Yin, Rishub Tamirisa, Jaehyuk Lim et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 84 citations
- Emergent World Representations: Exploring a Sequence Model Trained on a Synthetic TaskKenneth Li, Aspen K. Hopkins, David Bau, Fernanda B. Viégas et al.ICLR 2023 · 60 citations
- Do LLMs Build World Representations? Probing Through the Lens of State AbstractionZichao Li, Yanshuai Cao, Jackie CK CheungNeurIPS 2024 · 22 citations
Related papers
- Why Do LLM-based Web Agents Fail? A Hierarchical Planning PerspectiveMohamed Aghzal, Gregory J. Stein, Ziyu YaoACL 2026 · 5 citations
- DiLLS: Interactive Diagnosis of LLM-based Multi-agent Systems via Layered Summary of Agent BehaviorsRui Sheng, Yukun Yang, Chuhan Shi, Yanna Lin et al.CHI 2026 · 2 citations
- LLM Beliefs Are in Their HeadsAlessandro Corona Mendozza, Anders SøgaardACL 2026
- General agents need world modelsJonathan Richens, Tom Everitt, David AbelICML 2025
- VLN-MME: Diagnosing MLLMs as Language-guided Visual Navigation AgentsXunyi Zhao, Gengze Zhou, Qi WuACL 2026 · 3 citations
