Finding the Needle in a Haystack: On the Automatic Identification of Accessibility User Reviews
Eman Abdullah AlOmar, Wajdi Aljedaani, Murtaza Tamjeed, Mohamed Wiem Mkaouer, Yasmine N. El-Glaly
Abstract
In recent years, mobile accessibility has become an important trend with the goal of allowing all users the possibility of using any app without many limitations. User reviews include insights that are useful for app evolution. However, with the increase in the amount of received reviews, manually analyzing them is tedious and time-consuming, especially when searching for accessibility reviews. The goal of this paper is to support the automated identification of accessibility in user reviews, to help technology professionals in prioritizing their handling, and thus, creating more inclusive apps. Particularly, we design a model that takes as input accessibility user reviews, learns their keyword-based features, in order to make a binary decision, for a given review, on whether it is about accessibility or not. The model is evaluated using a total of 5,326 mobile app reviews. The findings show that (1) our model can accurately identify accessibility reviews, outperforming two baselines, namely keyword-based detector and a random classifier; (2) our model achieves an accuracy of 85% with relatively small training dataset; however, the accuracy improves as we increase the size of the training dataset.
• Human-centered computing → Empirical studies in accessibility; Ubiquitous and mobile devices.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 3adaac68-7829-47a0-a89c-a3c16e379b52Cited by top-tier papers3
- #A11yDev: Understanding Contemporary Software Accessibility Practices from Twitter ConversationsSyed Fatiul Huq, Abdulaziz Alshayban, Ziyao He, Sam MalekCHI 2023 · 17 citations
- Smooth Flipping Probability for Differential Private Sign Random Projection MethodsPing Li, Xiaoyun LiNeurIPS 2023 · 7 citations
- OPORP: One Permutation + One Random ProjectionPing Li, Xiaoyun LiKDD 2023 · 1 citation
Builds on1
Related papers
- MotorEase: Automated Detection of Motor Impairment Accessibility Issues in Mobile App UIsArun Krishna Vajjala, S. M. Hasan Mansur, Justin Jose, Kevin MoranICSE 2024 · 11 citations
- Analyzing Accessibility Reviews Associated with Visual Disabilities or Eye ConditionsAlberto Dumont Alves Oliveira, Paulo Sérgio Henrique Dos Santos, Wilson Estécio Marcílio Júnior, Wajdi M. Aljedaani et al.CHI 2023 · 38 citations
- Screen Recognition: Creating Accessibility Metadata for Mobile Applications from PixelsXiaoyi Zhang, Lilian de Greef, Amanda Swearngin, Samuel White et al.CHI 2021 · 145 citations
- Groundhog: An Automated Accessibility Crawler for Mobile AppsNavid Salehnamadi, Forough Mehralian, Sam MalekASE 2022 · 23 citations
- What Do We Mean by "Accessibility Research"?: A Literature Survey of Accessibility Papers in CHI and ASSETS from 1994 to 2019Kelly Mack, Emma McDonnell, Dhruv Jain, Lucy Lu Wang et al.CHI 2021 · 323 citations
