Lune

ACL Findings2025

A Study into Investigating Temporal Robustness of LLMs

Jonas Wallat, Abdelrahman Abdallah, Adam Jatowt, Avishek Anand

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) encapsulate a surprising amount of factual world knowledge. However, their performance on temporal questions and historical knowledge is limited because they often cannot understand temporal scope and orientation or neglect the temporal aspect altogether. In this study, we aim to measure precisely how robust LLMs are for question answering based on their ability to process temporal information and perform tasks requiring temporal reasoning and temporal factual knowledge. Specifically, we design eight time-sensitive robustness tests for factual information to check the sensitivity of six popular LLMs in the zero-shot setting. Overall, we find LLMs lacking temporal robustness, especially to temporal reformulations and the use of different granularities of temporal references. We show how a selection of these eight tests can be used automatically to judge a model's temporal robustness for user questions on the fly. Finally, we apply the findings of this study to improve the temporal QA performance by up to 55%.

Ask Lune

Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.

Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.

Questions to start from

Lune answers from

the full paper · 4 top-tier papers that cite it · related work

Get the answer

Free to start. No credit card required.

Cited by top-tier papers4

  1. It's High Time: A Survey of Temporal Question AnsweringBhawna Piryani, Abdelrahman Abdallah, Jamshid Mozafari, Avishek Anand et al.ACL 2026 · 6 citations
  2. When Silence Is Golden: Can LLMs Learn to Abstain in Temporal QA and Beyond?Xinyu Zhou, Chang Jin, Carsten Eickhoff, Zhijiang Guo et al.ICLR 2026 · 6 citations
  3. Sample Efficient Demonstration Selection for In-Context LearningKiran Purohit, Venktesh V, Sourangshu Bhattacharya, Avishek AnandICML 2025
  4. ODL-TempLLM: Ontology-Guided and Description Logic-Reasoned Temporal Reasoning with LLMsJinshuo Liu, Cheng Bi, Meng Wang, Juan Deng et al.ACL 2026

Builds on21

  1. Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
  2. Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
  3. Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTKevin Meng, David Bau, Alex Andonian, Yonatan BelinkovNeurIPS 2022 · 3,415 citations
  4. When Not to Trust Language Models: Investigating Effectiveness of Parametric and Non-Parametric MemoriesAlex Mallen, Akari Asai, Victor Zhong, Rajarshi Das et al.ACL 2023 · 233 citations
  5. Analysing Lexical Semantic Change with Contextualised Word RepresentationsMario Giulianelli, Marco Del Tredici, Raquel FernándezACL 2020 · 118 citations

Related papers

  1. Harnessing Temporal Databases for Systematic Evaluation of Factual Time-Sensitive Question-Answering in LLMsSoyeon Kim, Jindong Wang, Xing Xie, Steven Euijong WhangICLR 2026
  2. Enhancing Temporal Sensitivity and Reasoning for Time-Sensitive Question AnsweringWanqi Yang, Yanda Li, Meng Fang, Ling ChenEMNLP Findings 2024 · 4 citations
  3. AdapTime: Enabling Adaptive Temporal Reasoning in Large Language ModelsYimin Deng, Yejing Wang, Zhenxi Lin, Zichuan Fu et al.ACL Findings 2026
  4. UnSeenTimeQA: Time-Sensitive Question-Answering Beyond LLMs' MemorizationMd Nayem Uddin, Amir Saeidi, Divij Handa, Agastya Seth et al.ACL 2025 · 18 citations
  5. Static Models, Dynamic World: A Unified Perspective on Temporal Perception in Large Language ModelsChenhao Li, Dandan Song, Changzhi Zhou, Jun Yang et al.ACL Findings 2026 · 1 citation
Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines