Dynamic Weight Grafting: Localizing Finetuned Factual Knowledge in Transformers
Todd Nief, David Reber, Sean M. Richardson, Ari Holtzman
Abstract
When an LLM learns a new fact during finetuning (e.g., new movie releases, newly elected pope, etc.), where does this information go? Are entities enriched with relation information immediately, or do models recall information just-in-time before a prediction? Or, are "all of the above" true, with LLMs implementing multiple redundant heuristics? Existing localization approaches (e.g., activation patching) are ill-suited for this analysis because they usually replace parts of the residual stream, thus overriding previous information. To fill this interpretability gap, we propose dynamic weight grafting, an analysis technique that selectively grafts subsets of weights from a finetuned model onto a pretrained model. Using this technique, we show two separate pathways for retrieving finetuned relation information: 1) "enriching" the residual stream with relation information while processing the tokens that correspond to an entity (e.g., "Zendaya" in "Zendaya co-starred with Timothée Chalamet" and 2) "recalling" this information at the final token position before generating a target fact. In some cases, models need information from both of these pathways to correctly generate finetuned facts while, in other cases, either the "enrichment" or "recall" pathway alone is sufficient. We localize the "recall" pathway to model components---finding that "recall" occurs via both task-specific attention mechanisms and an entity-specific extraction step in the feedforward networks of the final layers before prediction. By targeting model components and parameters, as opposed to just activations, we are able to understand the mechanisms by which finetuned knowledge is retrieved during generation.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 3a7e9790-e910-45e6-84dc-06a38607a90bBuilds on28
- Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTKevin Meng, David Bau, Alex Andonian, Yonatan BelinkovNeurIPS 2022 · 3,415 citations
- Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and ScalingStella Biderman, Hailey Schoelkopf, Quentin Gregory Anthony, Herbie Bradley et al.ICML 2023 · 1,822 citations
- Do Vision Transformers See Like Convolutional Neural Networks?Maithra Raghu, Thomas Unterthiner, Simon Kornblith, Chiyuan Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 1,553 citations
- Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language ModelsRobert Huben, Hoagy Cunningham, Logan Riggs Smith, Aidan Ewart et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,072 citations
- TIES-Merging: Resolving Interference When Merging ModelsPrateek Yadav, Derek Tam, Leshem Choshen, Colin A. Raffel et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 999 citations
Related papers
- Extractive Structures Learned in Pretraining Enable Generalization on Finetuned FactsJiahai Feng, Stuart Russell, Jacob SteinhardtICML 2025
- Fine-Tuning Enhances Existing Mechanisms: A Case Study on Entity TrackingNikhil Prakash, Tamar Rott Shaham, Tal Haklay, Yonatan Belinkov et al.ICLR 2024 · 113 citations
- Dissecting Recall of Factual Associations in Auto-Regressive Language ModelsMor Geva, Jasmijn Bastings, Katja Filippova, Amir GlobersonEMNLP 2023 · 38 citations
- Fine-Tuning or Retrieval? Comparing Knowledge Injection in LLMsOded Ovadia, Menachem Brief, Moshik Mishaeli, Oren ElishaEMNLP 2024 · 89 citations
- Learning to Interpret Weight Differences in Language ModelsAvichal Goel, Yoon Kim, Nir N Shavit, Tony T. WangICLR 2026 · 10 citations
