Extracting alignment data in open models
Federico Barbero, Xiangming Gu, Christopher A. Choquette Choo, Chawin Sitawarin, Matthew Jagielski, Itay Yona, Petar Veličković, Ilia Shumailov, Jamie Hayes
Abstract
Work performed while the author was at Google DeepMind, ** Now at OpenAI In this work, we show that it is possible to extract significant amounts of alignment training data from a post-trained model -useful to steer the model to improve certain capabilities such as long-context reasoning, safety, instruction following, and maths. While the majority of related work on memorisation has focused on measuring success of training data extraction through string matching, we argue that embedding models are better suited for our specific goals. Distances measured through a high quality embedding model can identify semantic similarities between strings that a different metric such as edit distance will struggle to capture. In fact, in our investigation, approximate string matching would have severely undercounted (by a conservative estimate of 10×) the amount of data that can be extracted due to trivial artifacts that deflate the metric. Interestingly, we find that models readily regurgitate training data that was used in post-training phases such as SFT or RL. We show that this data can be then used to train a base model, recovering a meaningful amount of the original performance. We believe our work exposes a possibly overlooked risk towards extracting alignment data. Finally, our work opens up an interesting discussion on the downstream effects of distillation practices: since models seem to be regurgitating aspects of their training set, distillation can therefore be thought of as indirectly training on the model's original dataset. This paper only considers and discusses open models. Introduction Progress in capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) is frequently driven by improvements to training data recipes. It is common for a model developer to curate smaller and targeted data bundles to push performance on particular downstream benchmarks. For the purpose of this work, we refer to this data as 'alignment' data. We use the term broadly to encompass not only data used for safety and instruction-following (such as Supervised Finetuning (SFT) and Reinforcement Learning (RL) datasets), but also any targeted data collections used to steer model behaviour and enhance specific capabilities, including mathematics, reasoning, and long-context understanding. While this type of data is usually found in post-training, it is becoming increasingly common to include it also earlier in training (Meta, 2025) . We use the term alignment rather than post-training in our work for this reason. The fact that models memorise subsets of their training data is now a well-established phenomenon (
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 3a7bf505-6f67-42cc-ae55-73ddb9d80079Cited by top-tier papers2
- Beyond Indistinguishability: Measuring Extraction Risk in LLM APIsRuixuan Liu, David Evans, Li XiongS&P 2026 · 1 citation
- Private Direct Preference Optimization for LLM AlignmentYangfan Jiang, Fei Wei, Ergute Bao, Xiaokui Xiao et al.CCS 2026
Builds on22
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Extracting Training Data from Large Language ModelsNicholas Carlini, Florian Tramèr, Eric Wallace, Matthew Jagielski et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 2,866 citations
- Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language ModelsAitor Lewkowycz, Anders Andreassen, David Dohan, Ethan Dyer et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 2,039 citations
Related papers
- Scalable Extraction of Training Data from Aligned, Production Language ModelsMilad Nasr, Javier Rando, Nicholas Carlini, Jonathan Hayase et al.ICLR 2025
- Retracing the Past: LLMs Emit Training Data When They Get LostMyeongseob Ko, Nikhil Reddy Billa, Adam Nguyen, Charles Fleming et al.EMNLP 2025 · 1 citation
- Alignment at Pre-training! Towards Native Alignment for Arabic LLMsJuhao Liang, Zhenyang Cai, Jianqing Zhu, Huang Huang et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 19 citations
- Emulated Disalignment: Safety Alignment for Large Language Models May Backfire!Zhanhui Zhou, Jie Liu, Zhichen Dong, Jiaheng Liu et al.ACL 2024
- In-Training Defenses Against Emergent Misalignment in Language ModelsDavid Kaczér, Magnus Jørgenvåg, Clemens Vetter, Esha Afzal et al.ICML 2026 · 13 citations
