Lune

EMNLP Findings2023

Measuring bias in Instruction-Following models with P-AT

Dario Onorati, Elena Sofia Ruzzetti, Davide Venditti, Leonardo Ranaldi, Fabio Massimo Zanzotto

Abstract

Instruction-Following Language Models (IFLMs) are promising and versatile tools for solving many downstream, informationseeking tasks. Given their success, there is an urgent need to have a shared resource to determine whether existing and new IFLMs are prone to produce biased language interactions. In this paper, we propose Prompt Association Test (P-AT): a new resource for testing the presence of social biases in IFLMs. P-AT stems from WEAT (Caliskan et al., 2017) and generalizes the notion of measuring social biases to IFLMs. Basically, we cast WEAT word tests in promptized classification tasks, and we associate a metric -the bias score. Our resource consists of 2310 prompts. We then experimented with several families of IFLMs discovering gender and race biases in all the analyzed models. We expect P-AT to be an important tool for quantifying bias across different dimensions and, therefore, for encouraging the creation of fairer IFLMs before their distortions have consequences in the real world.

Ask Lune

Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.

Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.

Questions to start from

Lune answers from

the full paper · 3 top-tier papers that cite it · related work

Get the answer

Free to start. No credit card required.

Cited by top-tier papers3

  1. Metrics for What, Metrics for Whom: Assessing Actionability of Bias Evaluation Metrics in NLPPieter Delobelle, Giuseppe Attanasio, Debora Nozza, Su Lin Blodgett et al.EMNLP 2024 · 4 citations
  2. Measuring Bias or Measuring the Task: Understanding the Brittle Nature of LLM Gender BiasesBufan Gao, Elisa KreissEMNLP 2025 · 1 citation
  3. Blind Men and the Elephant: Diverse Perspectives on Gender Stereotypes in Benchmark DatasetsMahdi Zakizadeh, Mohammad Taher PilehvarEMNLP 2025

Builds on6

  1. RealToxicityPrompts: Evaluating Neural Toxic Degeneration in Language ModelsSamuel Gehman, Suchin Gururangan, Maarten Sap, Yejin Choi et al.EMNLP Findings 2020 · 692 citations
  2. Crosslingual Generalization through Multitask FinetuningNiklas Muennighoff, Thomas Wang, Lintang Sutawika, Adam Roberts et al.ACL 2023 · 319 citations
  3. CrowS-Pairs: A Challenge Dataset for Measuring Social Biases in Masked Language ModelsNikita Nangia, Clara Vania, Rasika Bhalerao, Samuel R. BowmanEMNLP 2020 · 19 citations
  4. Bad Seeds: Evaluating Lexical Methods for Bias MeasurementMaria Antoniak, David MimnoACL 2021
  5. Stereotyping Norwegian Salmon: An Inventory of Pitfalls in Fairness Benchmark DatasetsSu Lin Blodgett, Gilsinia Lopez, Alexandra Olteanu, Robert Sim et al.ACL 2021

Related papers

  1. This prompt is measuring : evaluating bias evaluation in language modelsSeraphina Goldfarb-Tarrant, Eddie Ungless, Esma Balkir, Su Lin BlodgettACL Findings 2023 · 10 citations
  2. Global Voices, Local Biases: Socio-Cultural Prejudices across LanguagesAnjishnu Mukherjee, Chahat Raj, Ziwei Zhu, Antonios AnastasopoulosEMNLP 2023 · 6 citations
  3. No Word Embedding Model Is Perfect: Evaluating the Representation Accuracy for Social Bias in the MediaMaximilian Spliethöver, Maximilian Keiff, Henning WachsmuthEMNLP Findings 2022
  4. Bias in Language Models: Beyond Trick Tests and Towards RUTEd EvaluationKristian Lum, Jacy Reese Anthis, Kevin Robinson, Chirag Nagpal et al.ACL 2025 · 41 citations
  5. AutoPrompt: Eliciting Knowledge from Language Models with Automatically Generated PromptsTaylor Shin, Yasaman Razeghi, Robert L. Logan IV, Eric Wallace et al.EMNLP 2020 · 1,162 citations
Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines