Enhancing Code Generation via Bidirectional Comment-Level Mutual Grounding
Yifeng Di, Tianyi Zhang
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated unprecedented capability in code generation. However, LLM-generated code is still plagued with a wide range of functional errors, especially for complex programming tasks that LLMs have not seen before. Recent studies have shown that developers often struggle with inspecting and fixing incorrect code generated by LLMs, diminishing their productivity and trust in LLM-based code generation. Inspired by the mutual grounding theory in communication, we propose an interactive approach that leverages code comments as a medium for developers and LLMs to establish a shared understanding. Our approach facilitates iterative grounding by interleaving code generation, inline comment generation, and contextualized user feedback through editable comments to align generated code with developer intent. We evaluated our approach on two popular benchmarks and demonstrated that our approach significantly improved multiple state-of-the-art LLMs, e.g., 17.1% pass@1 improvement for code-davinci-002 on HumanEval. Furthermore, we conducted a user study with 12 participants in comparison to two baselines: (1) interacting with GitHub Copilot, and (2) interacting with a multi-step code generation paradigm called Multi-Turn Program Synthesis. Participants completed the given programming tasks 16.7% faster and with 10.5% improvement in task success rate when using our approach. Both results show that interactively refining code comments enables the collaborative establishment of mutual grounding, leading to more accurate code generation and higher developer confidence.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers3
- AdaDec: A Uncertainty-Guided Lookahead Decoding Framework for LLM-Based Code GenerationKaifeng He, Mingwei Liu, Chong Wang, Zike Li et al.FSE 2026
- Selective Prompt Anchoring for Code GenerationYuan Tian, Tianyi ZhangICML 2025
- Knowledge-Graph-Driven Data Synthesis for Low-Resource Software Development: A HarmonyOS Case StudyMingwei Liu, Zheng Pei, Yanlin Wang, Zihao Wang et al.FSE 2026
Builds on15
- Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language ModelsShunyu Yao, Dian Yu, Jeffrey Zhao, Izhak Shafran et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,068 citations
- Teaching Large Language Models to Self-DebugXinyun Chen, Maxwell Lin, Nathanael Schärli, Denny ZhouICLR 2024 · 1,085 citations
- WizardCoder: Empowering Code Large Language Models with Evol-InstructZiyang Luo, Can Xu, Pu Zhao, Qingfeng Sun et al.ICLR 2024 · 945 citations
- DS-1000: A Natural and Reliable Benchmark for Data Science Code GenerationYuhang Lai, Chengxi Li, Yiming Wang, Tianyi Zhang et al.ICML 2023 · 504 citations
- Grounded Copilot: How Programmers Interact with Code-Generating ModelsShraddha Barke, Michael B. James, Nadia PolikarpovaOOPSLA 2023 · 408 citations
Related papers
- Interactive Evaluation of Large Language Models for Multi-Requirement Software Engineering TasksDimitrios Rontogiannis, Maxime Peyrard, Nicolas Mario Baldwin, Martin Josifoski et al.AAAI 2026 · 1 citation
- Large Language Models are Few-Shot Summarizers: Multi-Intent Comment Generation via In-Context LearningMingyang Geng, Shangwen Wang, Dezun Dong, Haotian Wang et al.ICSE 2024 · 124 citations
- Towards Understanding the Characteristics of Code Generation Errors Made by Large Language ModelsZhijie Wang, Zijie Zhou, Da Song, Yuheng Huang et al.ICSE 2025 · 12 citations
- Self-Edit: Fault-Aware Code Editor for Code GenerationKechi Zhang, Zhuo Li, Jia Li, Ge Li et al.ACL 2023 · 42 citations
- Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code GenerationJiawei Liu, Chunqiu Steven Xia, Yuyao Wang, Lingming ZhangNeurIPS 2023 · 2,317 citations
