Lune

NeurIPS2022Top-tier venue

Cryptographic Hardness of Learning Halfspaces with Massart Noise

Ilias Diakonikolas, Daniel Kane, Pasin Manurangsi, Lisheng Ren

2022Year
35Citations
21Top-tier citations

Abstract

We study the complexity of PAC learning halfspaces in the presence of Massart noise. In this problem, we are given i.i.d. labeled examples (x,y)∈RN×{±1}(\mathbf{x}, y) \in \mathbb{R}^N \times \{ \pm 1\}, where the distribution of x\mathbf{x} is arbitrary and the label yy is a Massart corruption of f(x)f(\mathbf{x}), for an unknown halfspace f:RN→{±1}f: \mathbb{R}^N \to \{ \pm 1\}, with flipping probability η(x)≤η<1/2\eta(\mathbf{x}) \leq \eta<1/2. The goal of the learner is to compute a hypothesis with small 0-1 error. Our main result is the first computational hardness result for this learning problem. Specifically, assuming the (widely believed) subexponential-time hardness of the Learning with Errors (LWE) problem, we show that no polynomial-time Massart halfspace learner can achieve error better than Ω(η)\Omega(\eta), even if the optimal 0-1 error is small, namely OPT=2−log⁡c(N)\mathrm{OPT} = 2^{-\log^{c} (N)} for any universal constant c∈(0,1)c \in (0, 1). Prior work had provided qualitatively similar evidence of hardness in the Statistical Query model. Our computational hardness result essentially resolves the polynomial PAC learnability of Massart halfspaces, by showing that known efficient learning algorithms for the problem are nearly best possible.

Ask about this paper

Your agent reads all of it.

Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.

Questions to start from

Your agent calls

Luneget_paper_fulltext

Ask in Lune

Free to start. No credit card required.

lune papers fulltext 390288d4-0226-4bd5-b0cd-ac925f4ac8d9

Cited by top-tier papers21

Ask how each one uses it

Builds on3

Related papers

Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines