CodeCureAgent: Automatic Classification and Repair of Static Analysis Warnings
Pascal Joos, Islem Bouzenia, Michael Pradel
Abstract
Static analysis tools are widely used to detect bugs, vulnerabilities, and code smells. Traditionally, developers must resolve these warnings manually by analyzing the warning, deciding whether to fix or suppress it, and validating the correctness of the code change. Because this process is tedious, developers sometimes ignore warnings, leading to an accumulation of warnings and a degradation of code quality. Prior work suggests techniques to automatically repair static analysis warnings, but these are limited to specific analysis rules, cannot perform multi-file edits, and rely on weak validation mechanisms. This paper presents CodeCureAgent, an approach that harnesses LLM-based agents to automatically analyze, classify, and repair static analysis warnings. Unlike previous work, our method does not follow a predetermined algorithm. Instead, we adopt an agentic framework that iteratively invokes tools to gather additional information from the codebase (e.g., via code search) and edit the codebase to resolve the warning. CodeCureAgent detects and suppresses false positives, while fixing true positives when identified. We equip CodeCureAgent with a three-step heuristic to approve patches: (1) build the project, (2) verify that the warning disappears without introducing new warnings, and (3) run the test suite. We evaluate CodeCureAgent on a dataset of 1,000 SonarQube warnings found in 106 Java projects and covering 291 distinct rules. Our approach produces plausible fixes for 96.8% of the warnings, outperforming state-of-the-art baseline approaches by 29.2%-34.0% in plausible-fix rate. Manual inspection of 291 cases reveals a correct-fix rate of 86.3%, showing that CodeCureAgent can reliably repair static analysis warnings. The approach incurs LLM costs of about 2.9 cents (USD) and an end-to-end processing time of about four minutes per warning. We envision CodeCureAgent helping to clean existing codebases and being integrated into CI/CD pipelines to prevent the accumulation of static analysis warnings.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 38d1cb2c-757b-473c-92f2-3ee375a35507Builds on25
- Teaching Large Language Models to Self-DebugXinyun Chen, Maxwell Lin, Nathanael Schärli, Denny ZhouICLR 2024 · 1,085 citations
- CoCoNuT: combining context-aware neural translation models using ensemble for program repairThibaud Lutellier, Hung Viet Pham, Lawrence Pang, Yitong Li et al.ISSTA 2020 · 325 citations
- Impact of Code Language Models on Automated Program RepairNan Jiang, Kevin Liu, Thibaud Lutellier, Lin TanICSE 2023 · 164 citations
- Neural Program Repair with Execution-based BackpropagationHe Ye, Matias Martinez, Martin MonperrusICSE 2022 · 146 citations
- Automated Program Repair via Conversation: Fixing 162 out of 337 Bugs for $0.42 Each using ChatGPTChunqiu Steven Xia, Lingming ZhangISSTA 2024 · 105 citations
Related papers
- QLCoder: A Query Synthesizer For Static Analysis of Security VulnerabilitiesClaire Wang, Ziyang Li, Saikat Dutta, Mayur NaikICLR 2026 · 22 citations
- RepairAgent: An Autonomous, LLM-Based Agent for Program RepairIslem Bouzenia, Premkumar T. Devanbu, Michael PradelICSE 2025 · 54 citations
- LLM-Based Repair of Static Nullability ErrorsNima Karimipour, Pascal Joos, Michael Pradel, Martin Kellogg et al.ISSTA 2026
- CORE: Resolving Code Quality Issues using LLMsNalin Wadhwa, Jui Pradhan, Atharv Sonwane, Surya Prakash Sahu et al.FSE 2024 · 32 citations
- RefAgent: A Multi-agent LLM-based Framework for Automatic Software RefactoringKhouloud Oueslati, Maxime Lamothe, Foutse KhomhICSE 2026 · 1 citation
