Unpacking the Use of Laboratory Test Results in an Online Health Community throughout the Medical Care Trajectory
Tera L. Reynolds, Jiawen Zhang, Kai Zheng, Yunan Chen
Abstract
While easy patient access to laboratory test results is necessary for patient engagement in their healthcare, it is not sufficient to enable patients to thrive in this role ? they must be able to understand and act upon these data. In this study, we analyzed posts to an online health community (OHC) that contained a patient's laboratory test results. The objective was to understand the nature of patients' questions related to these data to gain insights into how to better support patients as they individually and collaboratively make sense of their data. We found that patients seek help on the OHC to understand and use their laboratory test results at multiple points in the medical care trajectory. Specifically, in the diagnosis phase, patients tend to be focused on comprehending their data, to be receiving emotionally charged results and, of course, to be engaging the OHC in naming their medical issues. In the treatment phase, patients are often using their laboratory test results to ask more focused questions to identify treatment options, to seek treatment guidance from peers, and to predict the likely course of their disease. Throughout both phases, individuals are highly engaged in the medical process and put in substantial effort to proactively prepare for their care and interactions with doctors. They enlist the OHC in these efforts for many reasons such as a lack of confidence in their doctor. We discuss how gaps in the provision of healthcare services lead to the significant work involved in managing the complex and dynamic interplay between OHCs and the healthcare system. We offer design recommendations both for technologies that provide patients with access to their medical records and for OHCs that will likely continue to play an important role in filling gaps in healthcare services.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get 38b6aa43-2dfd-4e9e-bfd0-0819997176aaRelated papers
- Peer Recommendation Interventions for Health-related Social Support: a Feasibility AssessmentZachary Levonian, Matthew Zent, Ngan Nguyen, Matthew McNamara et al.CSCW 2025 · 4 citations
- Join, Stay or Go?: A Closer Look at Members' Life Cycles in Online Health CommunitiesZheng Yao, Diyi Yang, John M. Levine, Carissa A. Low et al.CSCW 2021 · 15 citations
- Self-tracking in Parkinson's The Lived Efforts of Self-managementJenny Vafeiadou, Asimina Vasalou, George RoussosCSCW 2021 · 15 citations
- Understanding the Temporality of Informal Caregivers' Sense-Making on Conflicts and Life-Changing Events through Online Health CommunitiesKefan Xu, Cynthia M. Baseman, Nathaniel Swinger, Myeonghan Ryu et al.CSCW 2025 · 2 citations
- Anyone else have this experience: Sharing the Emotional Labor of Tracking Data About MeMegan L. Knittel, Faye Kollig, Abrielle Mason, Rick WashCSCW 2021 · 23 citations
