Blind Signatures from Arguments of Inequality
Michael Klooß, Russell W. F. Lai, Michael Reichle
Abstract
Abstract. Blind signatures are an important tool for privacy-preserving applications with a long history dating back to Chaum’s seminal work in Crypto’82. In this work, we present the first pairing-free blind signature in the random oracle model that is concurrently-secure under the discrete logarithm assumption (without the algebraic group model). On a technical level, our work extends the recent proofs of inequality technique (Klooß and Reichle, Crypto’25) to arguments of inequality. The original technique relies on puncturing the verification key to make forgeries statistically impossible. We show how computational puncturing can be used, which opens the possibilities of applying the technique under weaker assumptions, at the cost of requiring a rewinding-based security reduction. In particular, this demonstrates that (notoriously difficult) rewinding-based techniques are still a viable path to Fiat–Shamir-based blind signatures.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get 382f0ac2-81d8-4ab2-a67c-ede04d655321Related papers
- Pairing-Free Blind Signatures from CDH AssumptionsRutchathon Chairattana-Apirom, Stefano Tessaro, Chenzhi ZhuCRYPTO 2024 · 18 citations
- Pairing-Free Blind Signatures from Standard Assumptions in the ROMJulia Kastner, Ky Nguyen, Michael ReichleCRYPTO 2024 · 11 citations
- Three-Move Blind Signatures in Pairing-Free GroupsYanbo ChenCRYPTO 2026
- Blind Signatures from Proofs of InequalityMichael Klooß, Michael ReichleCRYPTO 2025 · 7 citations
- Improved Concurrent-Secure Blind Schnorr SignaturesPierpaolo Della Monica, Ivan ViscontiCRYPTO 2026
