User Characteristics in Explainable AI: The Rabbit Hole of Personalization?
Robert Nimmo, Marios Constantinides, Ke Zhou, Daniele Quercia, Simone Stumpf
Abstract
As Artificial Intelligence (AI) becomes ubiquitous, the need for Explainable AI (XAI) has become critical for transparency and trust among users. A significant challenge in XAI is catering to diverse users, such as data scientists, domain experts, and end-users. Recent research has started to investigate how users' characteristics impact interactions with and user experience of explanations, with a view to personalizing XAI. However, are we heading down a rabbit hole by focusing on unimportant details? Our research aimed to investigate how user characteristics are related to using, understanding, and trusting an AI system that provides explanations. Our empirical study with 149 participants who interacted with an XAI system that flagged inappropriate comments showed that very few user characteristics mattered; only age and the personality trait openness influenced actual understanding. Our work provides evidence to reorient user-focused XAI research and question the pursuit of personalized XAI based on fine-grained user characteristics.
Disclaimer: This paper contains examples of language that some people may find offensive.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 380e8d47-d561-4eb9-a243-0ae02e53b62bCited by top-tier papers3
- People Attribute Purpose to Autonomous Vehicles When Explaining Their Behavior: Insights from Cognitive Science for Explainable AIBalint Gyevnar, Stephanie Droop, Tadeg Quillien, Shay B. Cohen et al.CHI 2025 · 7 citations
- Exploring Learners' Expectations and Engagement When Collaborating with Constructively Controversial Peer AgentsThitaree Tanprasert, Young-Ho Kim, Sidney S. Fels, Dongwook YoonCHI 2026 · 1 citation
- The Pervasive Blind Spot: Benchmarking VLM Inference Risks on Everyday Personal VideosShuning Zhang, Zhaoxin Li, Changxi Wen, Ying Ma et al.UbiComp 2026
Builds on5
- To Trust or to Think: Cognitive Forcing Functions Can Reduce Overreliance on AI in AI-assisted Decision-makingZana Buçinca, Maja Barbara Malaya, Krzysztof Z. GajosCSCW 2021 · 962 citations
- A Case for Humans-in-the-Loop: Decisions in the Presence of Erroneous Algorithmic ScoresMaria De-Arteaga, Riccardo Fogliato, Alexandra ChouldechovaCHI 2020 · 176 citations
- Impacts of Personal Characteristics on User Trust in Conversational Recommender SystemsWanling Cai, Yucheng Jin, Li ChenCHI 2022 · 54 citations
- User Trust in Recommendation Systems: A comparison of Content-Based, Collaborative and Demographic FilteringMengqi Liao, S. Shyam Sundar, Joseph B. WaltherCHI 2022 · 53 citations
- Gender and Participation in Open Source Software DevelopmentHana Frluckaj, Laura Dabbish, David Gray Widder, Huilian Sophie Qiu et al.CSCW 2022 · 39 citations
Related papers
- The Who in XAI: How AI Background Shapes Perceptions of AI ExplanationsUpol Ehsan, Samir Passi, Q. Vera Liao, Larry Chan et al.CHI 2024 · 121 citations
- "Help Me Help the AI": Understanding How Explainability Can Support Human-AI InteractionSunnie S. Y. Kim, Elizabeth Anne Watkins, Olga Russakovsky, Ruth Fong et al.CHI 2023 · 178 citations
- Contextualizing User Perceptions about Biases for Human-Centered Explainable Artificial IntelligenceTina Chien-Wen Yuan, Nanyi Bi, Ya-Fang Lin, Yuen-Hsien TsengCHI 2023 · 30 citations
- Domain Experience and Expertise in Explainable AI Applications: A Bearing Fault Diagnosis Case StudyZibin Zhao, Michael Castelle, Cagatay TurkayCSCW 2025 · 1 citation
- The Explanation That Hits Home: The Characteristics of Verbal Explanations That Affect Human Perception in Subjective Decision-MakingSharon A. Ferguson, Paula Akemi Aoyagui, Rimsha Rizvi, Young-Ho Kim et al.CSCW 2024 · 14 citations
