Spatial-frequency channels, shape bias, and adversarial robustness
Ajay Subramanian, Elena Sizikova, Najib J. Majaj, Denis G. Pelli
Abstract
What spatial frequency information do humans and neural networks use to recognize objects? In neuroscience, critical band masking is an established tool that can reveal the frequency-selective filters used for object recognition. Critical band masking measures the sensitivity of recognition performance to noise added at each spatial frequency. Existing critical band masking studies show that humans recognize periodic patterns (gratings) and letters by means of a spatial-frequency filter (or "channel") that has a frequency bandwidth of one octave (doubling of frequency). Here, we introduce critical band masking as a task for network-human comparison and test 14 humans and 76 neural networks on 16-way ImageNet categorization in the presence of narrowband noise. We find that humans recognize objects in natural images using the same one-octave-wide channel that they use for letters and gratings, making it a canonical feature of human object recognition. Unlike humans, the neural network channel is very broad, 2-4 times wider than the human channel. This means that the network channel extends to frequencies higher and lower than those that humans are sensitive to. Thus, noise at those frequencies will impair network performance and spare human performance. Adversarial and augmented-image training are commonly used to increase network robustness and shape bias. Does this training align network and human object recognition channels? Three network channel properties (bandwidth, center frequency, peak noise sensitivity) correlate strongly with shape bias (51% variance explained) and robustness of adversarially-trained networks (66% variance explained). Adversarial training increases robustness but expands the channel bandwidth even further beyond the human bandwidth. Thus, critical band masking reveals that the network channel is more than twice as wide as the human channel, and that adversarial training only makes it worse. Networks with narrower channels might be more robust. 37th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2023).
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 376d5622-85ec-4543-b099-fd40aaf1a48eCited by top-tier papers20
- On the Foundations of Shortcut LearningKatherine L. Hermann, Hossein Mobahi, Thomas Fel, Michael Curtis MozerICLR 2024 · 72 citations
- Intriguing Properties of Generative ClassifiersPriyank Jaini, Kevin Clark, Robert GeirhosICLR 2024 · 61 citations
- Adversarial Robustness Limits via Scaling-Law and Human-Alignment StudiesBrian R. Bartoldson, James Diffenderfer, Konstantinos Parasyris, Bhavya KailkhuraICML 2024 · 45 citations
- ImageNet-trained CNNs are not biased towards texture: Revisiting feature reliance through controlled suppressionTom Burgert, Oliver Stoll, Paolo Rota, Begüm DemirNeurIPS 2025 · 19 citations
- Towards Combating Frequency Simplicity-biased Learning for Domain GeneralizationXilin He, Jingyu Hu, Qinliang Lin, Cheng Luo et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 16 citations
Builds on11
- A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual RepresentationsTing Chen, Simon Kornblith, Mohammad Norouzi, Geoffrey E. HintonICML 2020 · 24,064 citations
- An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at ScaleAlexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn et al.ICLR 2021 · 21,477 citations
- Scaling Vision Transformers to 22 Billion ParametersMostafa Dehghani, Josip Djolonga, Basil Mustafa, Piotr Padlewski et al.ICML 2023 · 848 citations
- Do Adversarially Robust ImageNet Models Transfer Better?Hadi Salman, Andrew Ilyas, Logan Engstrom, Ashish Kapoor et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 506 citations
- The Origins and Prevalence of Texture Bias in Convolutional Neural NetworksKatherine L. Hermann, Ting Chen, Simon KornblithNeurIPS 2020 · 369 citations
Related papers
- High-Frequency Component Helps Explain the Generalization of Convolutional Neural NetworksHaohan Wang, Xindi Wu, Zeyi Huang, Eric P. XingCVPR 2020
- Exploring perceptual straightness in learned visual representationsAnne Harrington, Vasha DuTell, Ayush Tewari, Mark Hamilton et al.ICLR 2023
- Strong and Precise Modulation of Human Percepts via Robustified ANNsGuy Gaziv, Michael J. Lee, James J. DiCarloNeurIPS 2023 · 12 citations
- HybridAugment++: Unified Frequency Spectra Perturbations for Model RobustnessMehmet Kerim Yucel, Ramazan Gokberk Cinbis, Pinar DuyguluICCV 2023 · 16 citations
- Rethinking and Improving Robustness of Convolutional Neural Networks: a Shapley Value-based Approach in Frequency DomainYiting Chen, Qibing Ren, Junchi YanNeurIPS 2022 · 36 citations
