InstaSHAP: Interpretable Additive Models Explain Shapley Values Instantly
James Enouen, Yan Liu
Abstract
In recent years, the Shapley value and SHAP explanations have emerged as one of the most dominant paradigms for providing post-hoc explanations of black-box models. Despite their well-founded theoretical properties, many recent works have focused on the limitations in both their computational efficiency and their representation power. The underlying connection with additive models, however, is left critically under-emphasized in the current literature. In this work, we find that a variational perspective linking GAM models and SHAP explanations is able to provide deep insights into nearly all recent developments. In light of this connection, we borrow in the other direction to develop a new method to train interpretable GAM models which are automatically purified to compute the Shapley value in a single forward pass. Finally, we provide theoretical results showing the limited representation power of GAM models is the same Achilles' heel existing in SHAP and discuss the implications for SHAP's modern usage in CV and NLP.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 375c98bc-3ceb-4611-8ff4-3563aa2bf471Cited by top-tier papers5
- SHAP Meets Tensor Networks: Provably Tractable Explanations with ParallelismReda Marzouk, Shahaf Bassan, Guy KatzNeurIPS 2025 · 9 citations
- Explaining Similarity in Vision-Language Encoders with Weighted Banzhaf InteractionsHubert Baniecki, Maximilian Muschalik, Fabian Fumagalli, Barbara Hammer et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 6 citations
- Additive Models Explained: A Computational Complexity ApproachShahaf Bassan, Michal Moshkovitz, Guy KatzNeurIPS 2025 · 4 citations
- Provably Explaining Neural Additive ModelsShahaf Bassan, Yizhak Yisrael Elboher, Tobias Ladner, Volkan Şahin et al.ICLR 2026 · 3 citations
- Verified SHAP: Provable Bounds for Exact Shapley Values of Neural NetworksDavid Boetius, Shahaf Bassan, Guy Katz, Stefan Leue et al.ICML 2026
Builds on13
- The Many Shapley Values for Model ExplanationMukund Sundararajan, Amir NajmiICML 2020 · 799 citations
- The Shapley Taylor Interaction IndexMukund Sundararajan, Kedar Dhamdhere, Ashish AgarwalICML 2020 · 199 citations
- FastSHAP: Real-Time Shapley Value EstimationNeil Jethani, Mukund Sudarshan, Ian Connick Covert, Su-In Lee et al.ICLR 2022 · 186 citations
- Shapley explainability on the data manifoldChristopher Frye, Damien de Mijolla, Tom Begley, Laurence Cowton et al.ICLR 2021 · 125 citations
- NODE-GAM: Neural Generalized Additive Model for Interpretable Deep LearningChun-Hao Chang, Rich Caruana, Anna GoldenbergICLR 2022 · 114 citations
Related papers
- Prediction via Shapley Value RegressionAmr Alkhatib, Roman Bresson, Henrik Boström, Michalis VazirgiannisICML 2025
- Gnothi Seauton: Empowering Faithful Self-Interpretability in Black-Box TransformersShaobo Wang, Hongxuan Tang, Mingyang Wang, Hongrui Zhang et al.ICLR 2025
- GNNShap: Scalable and Accurate GNN Explanation using Shapley ValuesSelahattin Akkas, Ariful AzadWWW 2024 · 31 citations
- Beyond TreeSHAP: Efficient Computation of Any-Order Shapley Interactions for Tree EnsemblesMaximilian Muschalik, Fabian Fumagalli, Barbara Hammer, Eyke HüllermeierAAAI 2024 · 35 citations
- GRAND-SLAMIN' Interpretable Additive Modeling with Structural ConstraintsShibal Ibrahim, Gabriel Afriat, Kayhan Behdin, Rahul MazumderNeurIPS 2023 · 15 citations
