Language Models as Continuous Self-Evolving Data Engineers
Peidong Wang, Ming Wang, Zhiming Ma, Xiaocui Yang, Shi Feng, Daling Wang, Yifei Zhang, Kaisong Song
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities, yet their further evolution is often hampered by the scarcity of high-quality training data and the heavy reliance of traditional methods on expert-labeled data. This reliance sets a ceiling on LLM performance and is particularly challenging in low data resource scenarios where extensive supervision is unavailable. To address this issue, we propose a novel paradigm named LANCE (LANguage models as Continuous self-Evolving data engineers) that enables LLMs to train themselves by autonomously generating, cleaning, reviewing, and annotating data with preference information. Our approach demonstrates that LLMs can serve as continuous self-evolving data engineers, significantly reducing the time and cost of post-training data construction. Through iterative fine-tuning on Qwen2 series models, we validate the effectiveness of LANCE across various tasks, showing that it can maintain high-quality data generation and continuously improve model performance. Across multiple benchmark dimensions, LANCE results in an average score enhancement of 3.64 for Qwen2-7B and 1.75 for Qwen2-7B-Instruct. This autonomous data construction paradigm not only lessens reliance on human experts or external models but also ensures data aligns with human preferences, offering a scalable path for LLM self-improvement, especially in contexts with limited supervisory data. Code is available at: https://github. com/Control-derek/LANCE .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on17
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Finetuned Language Models are Zero-Shot LearnersJason Wei, Maarten Bosma, Vincent Y. Zhao, Kelvin Guu et al.ICLR 2022 · 4,966 citations
- TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human FalsehoodsStephanie Lin, Jacob Hilton, Owain EvansACL 2022 · 3,228 citations
- WinoGrande: An Adversarial Winograd Schema Challenge at ScaleKeisuke Sakaguchi, Ronan Le Bras, Chandra Bhagavatula, Yejin ChoiAAAI 2020 · 3,037 citations
Related papers
- Self-Boosting Large Language Models with Synthetic Preference DataQingxiu Dong, Li Dong, Xingxing Zhang, Zhifang Sui et al.ICLR 2025
- Table-LLM-Specialist: Language Model Specialists for Tables using Iterative Fine-tuningJunjie Xing, Yeye He, Mengyu Zhou, Haoyu Dong et al.EMNLP 2025 · 2 citations
- Reliable Data Generation and Selection for Low-Resource Relation ExtractionJunjie Yu, Xing Wang, Wenliang ChenAAAI 2024 · 7 citations
- Programming Every Example: Lifting Pre-training Data Quality Like Experts at ScaleFan Zhou, Zengzhi Wang, Qian Liu, Junlong Li et al.ICML 2025
- Training Language Models on Synthetic Edit Sequences Improves Code SynthesisUlyana Piterbarg, Lerrel Pinto, Rob FergusICLR 2025
