Inducing and Exploiting Activation Sparsity for Fast Inference on Deep Neural Networks
Mark Kurtz, Justin Kopinsky, Rati Gelashvili, Alexander Matveev, John Carr, Michael Goin, William M. Leiserson, Sage Moore, Nir Shavit, Dan Alistarh
Abstract
Optimizing convolutional neural networks for fast inference has recently become an extremely active area of research. One of the go-to solutions in this context is weight pruning, which aims to reduce computational and memory footprint by removing large subsets of the connections in a neural network. Surprisingly, much less attention has been given to exploiting sparsity in the activation maps, which tend to be naturally sparse in many settings thanks to the structure of rectified linear (ReLU) activation functions. In this paper, we present an in-depth analysis of methods for maximizing the sparsity of the activations in a trained neural network, and show that, when coupled with an efficient sparse-input convolution algorithm, we can leverage this sparsity for significant performance gains. To induce highly sparse activation maps without accuracy loss, we introduce a new regularization technique, coupled with a new threshold-based sparsification method based on a parameterized activation function called Forced-Activation-Threshold Rectified Linear Unit (FATReLU). We examine the impact of our methods on popular image classification models, showing that most architectures can adapt to significantly sparser activation maps without any accuracy loss. Our second contribution is showing that these these compression gains can be translated into inference speedups: we provide a new algorithm to enable fast convolution operations over networks with sparse activations, and show that it can enable significant speedups for end-to-end inference on a range of popular models on the large-scale ImageNet image classification task on modern Intel CPUs, with little or no retraining cost.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers39
- SparseGPT: Massive Language Models Can be Accurately Pruned in One-ShotElias Frantar, Dan AlistarhICML 2023 · 1,240 citations
- Deja Vu: Contextual Sparsity for Efficient LLMs at Inference TimeZichang Liu, Jue Wang, Tri Dao, Tianyi Zhou et al.ICML 2023 · 318 citations
- ReLU Strikes Back: Exploiting Activation Sparsity in Large Language ModelsIman Mirzadeh, Keivan Alizadeh-Vahid, Sachin Mehta, Carlo C. del Mundo et al.ICLR 2024 · 109 citations
- Scaling for Training Time and Post-hoc Out-of-distribution Detection EnhancementKai Xu, Rongyu Chen, Gianni Franchi, Angela YaoICLR 2024 · 81 citations
- ZipLM: Inference-Aware Structured Pruning of Language ModelsEldar Kurtic, Elias Frantar, Dan AlistarhNeurIPS 2023 · 69 citations
Related papers
- Efficient Latency-Aware CNN Depth Compression via Two-Stage Dynamic ProgrammingJinuk Kim, Yeonwoo Jeong, Deokjae Lee, Hyun Oh SongICML 2023 · 1 citation
- SparseProp: Efficient Sparse Backpropagation for Faster Training of Neural Networks at the EdgeMahdi Nikdan, Tommaso Pegolotti, Eugenia Iofinova, Eldar Kurtic et al.ICML 2023 · 14 citations
- Adaptive Convolutional ReLUsHongyang Gao, Lei Cai, Shuiwang JiAAAI 2020 · 15 citations
- Sparse Weight Activation TrainingMd Aamir Raihan, Tor M. AamodtNeurIPS 2020 · 83 citations
- SparseTrain: Exploiting Dataflow Sparsity for Efficient Convolutional Neural Networks TrainingPengcheng Dai, Jianlei Yang, Xucheng Ye, Xingzhou Cheng et al.DAC 2020 · 27 citations
