The MAGICAL Benchmark for Robust Imitation
Sam Toyer, Rohin Shah, Andrew Critch, Stuart Russell
Abstract
Imitation Learning (IL) algorithms are typically evaluated in the same environment that was used to create demonstrations. This rewards precise reproduction of demonstrations in one particular environment, but provides little information about how robustly an algorithm can generalise the demonstrator's intent to substantially different deployment settings. This paper presents the MAGICAL benchmark suite, which permits systematic evaluation of generalisation by quantifying robustness to different kinds of distribution shift that an IL algorithm is likely to encounter in practice. Using the MAGICAL suite, we confirm that existing IL algorithms overfit significantly to the context in which demonstrations are provided. We also show that standard methods for reducing overfitting are effective at creating narrow perceptual invariances, but are not sufficient to enable transfer to contexts that require substantially different behaviour, which suggests that new approaches will be needed in order to robustly generalise demonstrator intent. Code and data for the MAGICAL suite is available at https://github.com/qxcv/magical/ .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 3613df6a-992a-4677-97bd-eb23134cee10Cited by top-tier papers10
- RT-Trajectory: Robotic Task Generalization via Hindsight Trajectory SketchesJiayuan Gu, Sean Kirmani, Paul Wohlhart, Yao Lu et al.ICLR 2024 · 135 citations
- VIMA: Robot Manipulation with Multimodal PromptsYunfan Jiang, Agrim Gupta, Zichen Zhang, Guanzhi Wang et al.ICML 2023 · 80 citations
- Reinforcement Learning from Passive Data via Latent IntentionsDibya Ghosh, Chethan Anand Bhateja, Sergey LevineICML 2023 · 69 citations
- Robust Imitation Learning against Variations in Environment DynamicsJongseong Chae, Seungyul Han, Whiyoung Jung, Myungsik Cho et al.ICML 2022 · 34 citations
- Learn what matters: cross-domain imitation learning with task-relevant embeddingsTim Franzmeyer, Philip H. S. Torr, João F. HenriquesNeurIPS 2022 · 28 citations
Builds on5
- Leveraging Procedural Generation to Benchmark Reinforcement LearningKarl Cobbe, Christopher Hesse, Jacob Hilton, John SchulmanICML 2020 · 685 citations
- Thieves on Sesame Street! Model Extraction of BERT-based APIsKalpesh Krishna, Gaurav Singh Tomar, Ankur P. Parikh, Nicolas Papernot et al.ICLR 2020 · 244 citations
- A Benchmark for Systematic Generalization in Grounded Language UnderstandingLaura Ruis, Jacob Andreas, Marco Baroni, Diane Bouchacourt et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 169 citations
- Safe Imitation Learning via Fast Bayesian Reward Inference from PreferencesDaniel S. Brown, Russell Coleman, Ravi Srinivasan, Scott NiekumICML 2020 · 113 citations
- Environmental drivers of systematicity and generalization in a situated agentFelix Hill, Andrew K. Lampinen, Rosalia Schneider, Stephen Clark et al.ICLR 2020 · 109 citations
Related papers
- Towards Diverse Behaviors: A Benchmark for Imitation Learning with Human DemonstrationsXiaogang Jia, Denis Blessing, Xinkai Jiang, Moritz Reuss et al.ICLR 2024 · 48 citations
- Dismantling the Illusion of Vision-Language-Action Models Competence via Explicit Distributional ShiftsXueyang Zhou, Yangming Xu, Guiyao Tie, Chaoran Hu et al.ICML 2026
- How robust is unsupervised representation learning to distribution shift?Yuge Shi, Imant Daunhawer, Julia E. Vogt, Philip H. S. Torr et al.ICLR 2023 · 6 citations
- Variational Adversarial Kernel Learned Imitation LearningFan Yang, Alina Vereshchaka, Yufan Zhou, Changyou Chen et al.AAAI 2020 · 9 citations
- Scalable Evaluation of Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning with Melting PotJoel Z. Leibo, Edgar A. Duéñez-Guzmán, Alexander Vezhnevets, John P. Agapiou et al.ICML 2021 · 134 citations
