Differential Privacy Under Class Imbalance: Methods and Empirical Insights
Lucas Rosenblatt, Yuliia Lut, Ethan Turok, Marco Avella Medina, Rachel Cummings
Abstract
Imbalanced learning occurs in classification settings where the distribution of class-labels is highly skewed in the training data, such as when predicting rare diseases or in fraud detection. This class imbalance presents a significant algorithmic challenge, which can be further exacerbated when privacypreserving techniques such as differential privacy are applied to protect sensitive training data. Our work formalizes these challenges and provides a number of algorithmic solutions. We consider DP variants of pre-processing methods that privately augment the original dataset to reduce the class imbalance; these include oversampling, SMOTE, and private synthetic data generation. We also consider DP variants of in-processing techniques, which adjust the learning algorithm to account for the imbalance; these include model bagging, class-weighted empirical risk minimization and class-weighted deep learning. For each method, we either adapt an existing imbalanced learning technique to the private setting or demonstrate its incompatibility with differential privacy. Finally, we empirically evaluate these privacy-preserving imbalanced learning methods under various data and distributional settings. We find that private synthetic data methods perform well as a data pre-processing step, while class-weighted ERMs are an alternative in higher-dimensional settings where private synthetic data suffers from the curse of dimensionality.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 35a8069b-79b2-4a2a-bb60-9c3449fcd430Cited by top-tier papers2
- SMOTE and Mirrors: Exposing Privacy Leakage from Synthetic Minority OversamplingGeorgi Ganev, MohammadReza Nazari, Rees Davison, Amirhassan Fallah Dizche et al.ICLR 2026 · 6 citations
- Privately Fine-Tuned LLMs Preserve Temporal Dynamics in Tabular DataLucas Rosenblatt, Peihan Liu, Ryan McKenna, Natalia PonomarevaICML 2026 · 1 citation
Builds on18
- Deep Learning with Differential PrivacyMartín Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian J. Goodfellow, H. Brendan McMahan et al.CCS 2016 · 7,620 citations
- Revisiting Deep Learning Models for Tabular DataYury Gorishniy, Ivan Rubachev, Valentin Khrulkov, Artem BabenkoNeurIPS 2021 · 1,847 citations
- Rethinking the Value of Labels for Improving Class-Imbalanced LearningYuzhe Yang, Zhi XuNeurIPS 2020 · 512 citations
- Hyperparameter Tuning with Renyi Differential PrivacyNicolas Papernot, Thomas SteinkeICLR 2022 · 157 citations
- AIM: An Adaptive and Iterative Mechanism for Differentially Private Synthetic DataRyan McKenna, Brett Mullins, Daniel Sheldon, Gerome MiklauVLDB 2022 · 136 citations
Related papers
- Robin Hood and Matthew Effects: Differential Privacy Has Disparate Impact on Synthetic DataGeorgi Ganev, Bristena Oprisanu, Emiliano De CristofaroICML 2022 · 78 citations
- Differentially Private Prototypes for Imbalanced Transfer LearningDariush Wahdany, Matthew Jagielski, Adam Dziedzic, Franziska BoenischAAAI 2025 · 4 citations
- INO-SGD: Addressing Utility Imbalance under Individualized Differential PrivacyXiao Tian, Jue Fan, Rachael Hwee Ling Sim, Bryan Kian Hsiang LowICLR 2026
- Synthetic Tabular Data Generation for Imbalanced Classification: The Surprising Effectiveness of an Overlap ClassAnnie D'souza, Swetha M, Sunita SarawagiAAAI 2025 · 9 citations
- Multi-Class Support Vector Machine with Differential PrivacyJinseong Park, Yujin Choi, Jaewook LeeNeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation
