How Does Sequence Modeling Architecture Influence Base Capabilities of Pre-trained Language Models? Exploring Key Architecture Design Principles to Avoid Base Capabilities Degradation
Xin Lu, Yanyan Zhao, Si Wei, Shijin Wang, Bing Qin, Ting Liu
Abstract
Pre-trained language models represented by the Transformer have been proven to possess strong base capabilities, and the representative self-attention mechanism in the Transformer has become a classic in sequence modeling architectures. Different from the work of proposing sequence modeling architecture to improve the efficiency of attention mechanism, this work focuses on the impact of sequence modeling architectures on base capabilities. Specifically, our concern is: How exactly do sequence modeling architectures affect the base capabilities of pre-trained language models? In this work, we first point out that the mixed domain pre-training setting commonly adopted in existing architecture design works fails to adequately reveal the differences in base capabilities among various architectures. To address this, we propose a limited domain pre-training setting with out-of-distribution testing, which successfully uncovers significant differences in base capabilities among architectures at an early stage. Next, we analyze the base capabilities of stateful sequence modeling architectures, and find that they exhibit significant degradation in base capabilities compared to the Transformer. Then, through a series of architecture component analysis, we summarize a key architecture design principle: A sequence modeling architecture need possess full-sequence arbitrary selection capability to avoid degradation in base capabilities. Finally, we empirically validate this principle using an extremely simple Top-1 element selection architecture and further generalize it to a more practical Top-1 chunk selection architecture. Experimental results demonstrate our proposed sequence modeling architecture design principle and suggest that our work can serve as a valuable reference for future architecture improvements and novel designs.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 356d2d43-d6a6-4c30-8ed4-a1b8ad0f0c88Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on20
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- Efficiently Modeling Long Sequences with Structured State SpacesAlbert Gu, Karan Goel, Christopher RéICLR 2022 · 3,482 citations
- Big Bird: Transformers for Longer SequencesManzil Zaheer, Guru Guruganesh, Kumar Avinava Dubey, Joshua Ainslie et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 3,159 citations
- WinoGrande: An Adversarial Winograd Schema Challenge at ScaleKeisuke Sakaguchi, Ronan Le Bras, Chandra Bhagavatula, Yejin ChoiAAAI 2020 · 3,037 citations
Related papers
- How does Architecture Influence the Base Capabilities of Pre-trained Language Models? A Case Study Based on FFN-Wider and MoE TransformersXin Lu, Yanyan Zhao, Bing Qin, Liangyu Huo et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 1 citation
- Understanding and Improving Length Generalization in Hierarchical Sparse Attention ModelsJiaqi Leng, Xiang Hu, Junxiong Wang, Jianguo Li et al.ICLR 2026 · 6 citations
- Analysing The Impact of Sequence Composition on Language Model Pre-TrainingYu Zhao, Yuanbin Qu, Konrad Staniszewski, Szymon Tworkowski et al.ACL 2024
- How do autoregressive transformers solve full addition?Wang Peixu, Chen Yu, Yu Ming, Cheng XiangEMNLP 2025
- Do Long-Range Language Models Actually Use Long-Range Context?Simeng Sun, Kalpesh Krishna, Andrew Mattarella-Micke, Mohit IyyerEMNLP 2021 · 35 citations
