On The Structure of Parametric Tournaments with Application to Ranking from Pairwise Comparisons
Vishnu Veerathu, Arun Rajkumar
Abstract
We consider the classical problem of finding the minimum feedback arc set on tournaments (MFAST). The problem is NP-hard in general and we study it for important classes of tournaments that arise naturally in the problem of learning to rank from pairwise comparisons. Specifically, we consider tournaments classes that arise out of parametric preference matrices that can lead to cyclic preference relations. We investigate their structural properties via forbidden sub tournament configurations. Towards this, we introduce Tournament Dimension -a combinatorial parameter that characterizes the size of a forbidden configuration for rank r tournament classes i.e., classes that arise out of pairwise preference matrices which lead to rank r skew-symmetric matrices under a suitable link function. Our main result is a polynomial-time algorithm -Rank2Rank -that solves the MFAST problem for the rank 2 tournament class. This is achieved via a geometric characterization that relies on our explicit construction of a forbidden configuration for this class. Building on our understanding of the rank-2 tournament class, we propose a very general and flexible parametric pairwise preference model called the localglobal model which subsumes the popular Bradley-Terry-Luce/Thurstone classes to capture locally cyclic as well as globally acyclic preference relations. We develop a polynomial-time algorithm -BlockRank2Rank-to solve the MFAST problem on the associated Block-Rank 2 tournament class. As an application, we study the problem of learning to rank from pairwise comparisons under the proposed local-global preference model. Exploiting our structural characterization, we propose PairwiseBlockRank -a pairwise ranking algorithm for this class. We show sample complexity bounds of PairwiseBlockRank to learn a good ranking under the proposed model. Finally, we conduct experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets to show the efficacy of the proposed algorithm.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itRelated papers
- A Theory of Tournament RepresentationsArun Rajkumar, Vishnu Veerathu, Abdul Bakey MirICLR 2022 · 3 citations
- How Hard Is It to Rig a Tournament When Few Players Can Beat or Be Beaten by the Favorite?Zhonghao Wang, Junqiang Peng, Yuxi Liu, Mingyu XiaoAAAI 2026 · 1 citation
- An Analysis of Elo Rating Systems via Markov ChainsSam Olesker-Taylor, Luca ZanettiNeurIPS 2024 · 9 citations
- Generalized Results for the Existence and Consistency of the MLE in the Bradley-Terry-Luce ModelHeejong Bong, Alessandro RinaldoICML 2022 · 23 citations
- 2-Approximating Feedback Vertex Set in TournamentsDaniel Lokshtanov, Pranabendu Misra, Joydeep Mukherjee, Fahad Panolan et al.SODA 2020 · 6 citations
