Formal Security Proofs via Doeblin Coefficients: - Optimal Side-Channel Factorization from Noisy Leakage to Random Probing
Julien Béguinot, Wei Cheng, Sylvain Guilley, Olivier Rioul
Abstract
Masking is one of the most popular countermeasures to sidechannel attacks, because it can offer provable security. However, depending on the adversary's model, useful security guarantees can be hard to provide. At first, masking has been shown secure against t-threshold probing adversaries by Ishai et al. at Crypto'03. It has then been shown secure in the more generic random probing model by Duc et al. at Eurocrypt'14. Prouff and Rivain have introduced the noisy leakage model to capture more realistic leakage at Eurocrypt'13. Reduction from noisy leakage to random probing has been introduced by Duc et al. at Eurocrypt'14, and security guarantees were improved for both models by Prest et al. at Crypto'19, Duc et al. in Eurocrypt'15/J. Cryptol'19, and Masure and Standaert at Crypto'23. Unfortunately, as it turns out, we found that previous proofs in either random probing or noisy leakage models are flawed, and such flaws do not appear easy to fix.
In this work, we show that the Doeblin coefficient allows one to overcome these flaws. In fact, it yields optimal reductions from noisy leakage to random probing, thereby providing a correct and usable metric to properly ground security proofs. This shows the inherent inevitable cost of a reduction from the noisy leakages to the random probing model. We show that it can also be used to derive direct formal security proofs using the subsequence decomposition of Prouff and Rivain.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 34698532-7e4f-4cbb-8a62-63542d3ad701Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on8
- Spectre Attacks: Exploiting Speculative ExecutionPaul Kocher, Jann Horn, Anders Fogh, Daniel Genkin et al.S&P 2019 · 2,435 citations
- Strong Non-Interference and Type-Directed Higher-Order MaskingGilles Barthe, Sonia Belaïd, François Dupressoir, Pierre-Alain Fouque et al.CCS 2016 · 302 citations
- Random Probing Security: Verification, Composition, Expansion and New ConstructionsSonia Belaïd, Jean-Sébastien Coron, Emmanuel Prouff, Matthieu Rivain et al.CRYPTO 2020 · 30 citations
- Towards Tight Random Probing SecurityGaëtan Cassiers, Sebastian Faust, Maximilian Orlt, François-Xavier StandaertCRYPTO 2021 · 22 citations
- On the Power of Expansion: More Efficient Constructions in the Random Probing ModelSonia Belaïd, Matthieu Rivain, Abdul Rahman TalebEUROCRYPT 2021 · 22 citations
Related papers
- Prouff and Rivain's Formal Security Proof of Masking, Revisited - Tight Bounds in the Noisy Leakage ModelLoïc Masure, François-Xavier StandaertCRYPTO 2023 · 10 citations
- From Random Probing to Noisy Leakages Without Field-Size DependenceGianluca Brian, Stefan Dziembowski, Sebastian FaustEUROCRYPT 2024 · 6 citations
- A Formal Security Proof of Masking - Reduction from Strong Noisy Leakage to Probing Model Without Random Probing and Application to LR PrimitiveRei Ueno, Akiko Inoue, Kazuhiko Minematsu, Akira Ito et al.CRYPTO 2026
- PERSEUS - Probabilistic Evaluation of Random Probing SEcurity Using Efficient SamplingSonia Belaïd, Gaëtan CassiersEUROCRYPT 2026
- Tighter Security Notions for a Modular Approach to Private CircuitsBohan Wang, Juelin Zhang, Yu Yu, Weijia WangEUROCRYPT 2025 · 2 citations
