Database Isolation By Scheduling
Kevin P. Gaffney, Robert K. Claus, Jignesh M. Patel
Abstract
Transaction isolation is conventionally achieved by restricting access to the physical items in a database. To maximize performance, isolation functionality is often packaged with recovery, I/O, and data access methods in a monolithic transactional storage manager. While this design has historically afforded high performance in online transaction processing systems, industry trends indicate a growing need for a new approach in which intertwined components of the transactional storage manager are disaggregated into modular services. This paper presents a new method to modularize the isolation component. Our work builds on predicate locking, an isolation mechanism that enables this modularization by locking logical rather than physical items in a database. Predicate locking is rarely used as the core isolation mechanism because of its high theoretical complexity and perceived overhead. However, we show that this overhead can be substantially reduced in practice by optimizing for common predicate structures. We present DIBS, a transaction scheduler that employs our predicate locking optimizations to guarantee isolation as a modular service. We evaluate the performance of DIBS as the sole isolation mechanism in a data processing system. In this setting, DIBS scales up to 10.5 million transactions per second on a TATP workload. We also explore how DIBS can be applied to existing database systems to increase transaction throughput. DIBS reduces per-transaction file system writes by 90% on TATP in SQLite, resulting in a 3X improvement in throughput. Finally, DIBS reduces row contention on YCSB in MySQL, providing serializable isolation with a 1.4X improvement in throughput.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers2
- Are Database System Researchers Making Correct Assumptions about Transaction Workloads?Cuong D. T. Nguyen, Kevin Chen, Christopher DeCarolis, Daniel J. AbadiSIGMOD 2025 · 4 citations
- Concurrency Control as a ServiceWeixing Zhou, Yanfeng Zhang, Xinji Zhou, Zhiyou Wang et al.VLDB 2025
Builds on1
Related papers
- Polaris: Enabling Transaction Priority in Optimistic Concurrency ControlChenhao Ye, Wuh-Chwen Hwang, Keren Chen, Xiangyao YuSIGMOD 2023 · 12 citations
- Breaking the Isolation-Freshness Trade-off: Joint Adaptive Storage Optimization for HTAP SystemsZhenghao Ding, Xinyi Zhang, Chao Zhang, Yishen Sun et al.VLDB 2026 · 1 citation
- Vbox: Efficient Black-Box Serializability VerificationWeihua Sun, Zhaonian ZouISSTA 2026
- Fast and Scalable In-network Lock Management Using Lock FissionHanze Zhang, Ke Cheng, Rong Chen, Haibo ChenOSDI 2024 · 9 citations
- Handling Highly Contended OLTP Workloads Using Fast Dynamic PartitioningGuna Prasaad, Alvin Cheung, Dan SuciuSIGMOD 2020 · 34 citations
