Semantic and Expressive Variations in Image Captions Across Languages
Andre Ye, Sebastin Santy, Jena D. Hwang, Amy X. Zhang, Ranjay Krishna
Abstract
Most vision-language models today are primarily trained on English image-text pairs, with non-English pairs often filtered out. Evidence from cross-cultural psychology suggests that this approach will bias models against perceptual modes exhibited by people who speak other (non-English) languages. We investigate semantic and expressive variation in image captions across different languages; we analyze both human-annotated datasets and model-produced captions. By analyzing captions across seven languages (English, French, German, Russian, Chinese, Japanese, Korean) in high-quality image captioning datasets (Crossmodal and Visual Genome), we find that multilingual caption sets tend to provide richer visual descriptions than monolingual (including English-only) ones; multilingual sets contain 46.0% more objects, 66.1% more relationships, and 66.8% more attributes. We observe the same results with multilingual captions produced by LLaVA and the Google Vertex API: for example, compared to monolingual captions, they cover 21.9% more objects, 18.8% more relations, and 20.1% more attributes. These suggest that, across a large number of samples, different languages bias people and models to focus on different visual concepts. Finally, we show that models trained on image-text data in one language perform distinctly better on that language's test set. Our work points towards the potential value of training vision models on multilingual data sources to widen the range/variation of descriptive information those models are exposed to.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 340e0c75-7d01-4899-8361-bb351f508b6aCited by top-tier papers2
- World in a Frame: Understanding Culture Mixing as a New Challenge for Vision-Language ModelsEunsu Kim, Junyeong Park, Na Min An, Junseong Kim et al.CVPR 2026 · 3 citations
- Disability-First AI Dataset Annotation: Co-designing Stuttered Speech Annotation Guidelines with People Who StutterXinru Tang, Jingjin Li, Shaomei WuCHI 2026 · 3 citations
Builds on29
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- Visual Instruction TuningHaotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Qingyang Wu, Yong Jae LeeNeurIPS 2023 · 11,349 citations
- BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and GenerationJunnan Li, Dongxu Li, Caiming Xiong, Steven C. H. HoiICML 2022 · 6,549 citations
- ViLT: Vision-and-Language Transformer Without Convolution or Region SupervisionWonjae Kim, Bokyung Son, Ildoo KimICML 2021 · 2,258 citations
- Measuring Robustness to Natural Distribution Shifts in Image ClassificationRohan Taori, Achal Dave, Vaishaal Shankar, Nicholas Carlini et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 731 citations
Related papers
- Multilingual Diversity Improves Vision-Language RepresentationsThao Nguyen, Matthew Wallingford, Sebastin Santy, Wei-Chiu Ma et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 19 citations
- See It from My Perspective: How Language Affects Cultural Bias in Image UnderstandingAmith Ananthram, Elias Stengel-Eskin, Mohit Bansal, Kathleen McKeownICLR 2025 · 3 citations
- LRM-LLaVA: Overcoming the Modality Gap of Multilingual Large Language-Vision Model for Low-Resource LanguagesJunchen Li, Qing Yang, Bojian Jiang, Shaolin Zhu et al.AAAI 2025 · 3 citations
- UC2: Universal Cross-Lingual Cross-Modal Vision-and-Language Pre-TrainingMingyang Zhou, Luowei Zhou, Shuohang Wang, Yu Cheng et al.CVPR 2021
- No Filter: Cultural and Socioeconomic Diversity in Contrastive Vision-Language ModelsAngéline Pouget, Lucas Beyer, Emanuele Bugliarello, Xiao Wang et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 17 citations
