MOCHA: A Dataset for Training and Evaluating Generative Reading Comprehension Metrics
Anthony Chen, Gabriel Stanovsky, Sameer Singh, Matt Gardner
Abstract
Posing reading comprehension as a generation problem provides a great deal of flexibility, allowing for open-ended questions with few restrictions on possible answers. However, progress is impeded by existing generation metrics, which rely on token overlap and are agnostic to the nuances of reading comprehension. To address this, we introduce a benchmark for training and evaluating generative reading comprehension metrics: MOdeling Correctness with Human Annotations. MOCHA contains 40K human judgement scores on model outputs from 6 diverse question answering datasets and an additional set of minimal pairs for evaluation. Using MOCHA, we train a Learned Evaluation metric for Reading Comprehension, LERC, to mimic human judgement scores. LERC outperforms baseline metrics by 10 to 36 absolute Pearson points on held-out annotations. When we evaluate robustness on minimal pairs, LERC achieves 80% accuracy, outperforming baselines by 14 to 26 absolute percentage points while leaving significant room for improvement. MOCHA presents a challenging problem for developing accurate and robust generative reading comprehension metrics. 1 * Work done while at the Allen Institute for AI and the University of Washington. 1 The dataset, code, a leaderboard, and a demo are available at https://allennlp.org/mocha .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers12
- A Systematic Survey and Critical Review on Evaluating Large Language Models: Challenges, Limitations, and RecommendationsMd. Tahmid Rahman Laskar, Sawsan Alqahtani, M. Saiful Bari, Mizanur Rahman et al.EMNLP 2024 · 47 citations
- Tomayto, Tomahto. Beyond Token-level Answer Equivalence for Question Answering EvaluationJannis Bulian, Christian Buck, Wojciech Gajewski, Benjamin Börschinger et al.EMNLP 2022 · 34 citations
- A Critical Evaluation of Evaluations for Long-form Question AnsweringFangyuan Xu, Yixiao Song, Mohit Iyyer, Eunsol ChoiACL 2023 · 25 citations
- Open-ended VQA benchmarking of Vision-Language models by exploiting Classification datasets and their semantic hierarchySimon Ging, María Alejandra Bravo, Thomas BroxICLR 2024 · 24 citations
- Foundational Autoraters: Taming Large Language Models for Better Automatic EvaluationTu Vu, Kalpesh Krishna, Salaheddin Alzubi, Chris Tar et al.EMNLP 2024 · 14 citations
Builds on5
- BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTTianyi Zhang, Varsha Kishore, Felix Wu, Kilian Q. Weinberger et al.ICLR 2020 · 8,443 citations
- Learning The Difference That Makes A Difference With Counterfactually-Augmented DataDivyansh Kaushik, Eduard H. Hovy, Zachary Chase LiptonICLR 2020 · 625 citations
- Asking and Answering Questions to Evaluate the Factual Consistency of SummariesAlex Wang, Kyunghyun Cho, Mike LewisACL 2020 · 317 citations
- BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text GenerationThibault Sellam, Dipanjan Das, Ankur P. ParikhACL 2020 · 40 citations
- On The Evaluation of Machine Translation SystemsTrained With Back-TranslationSergey Edunov, Myle Ott, Marc'Aurelio Ranzato, Michael AuliACL 2020 · 15 citations
Related papers
- Assessing the Benchmarking Capacity of Machine Reading Comprehension DatasetsSaku Sugawara, Pontus Stenetorp, Kentaro Inui, Akiko AizawaAAAI 2020 · 92 citations
- What do Models Learn from Question Answering Datasets?Priyanka Sen, Amir SaffariEMNLP 2020 · 40 citations
- MMIE: Massive Multimodal Interleaved Comprehension Benchmark for Large Vision-Language ModelsPeng Xia, Siwei Han, Shi Qiu, Yiyang Zhou et al.ICLR 2025
- ReCO: A Large Scale Chinese Reading Comprehension Dataset on OpinionBingning Wang, Ting Yao, Qi Zhang, Jingfang Xu et al.AAAI 2020 · 26 citations
- ESTER: A Machine Reading Comprehension Dataset for Reasoning about Event Semantic RelationsRujun Han, I-Hung Hsu, Jiao Sun, Julia Baylon et al.EMNLP 2021 · 30 citations
