Lune

NeurIPS2023Top-tier venue

Hardness of Low Rank Approximation of Entrywise Transformed Matrix Products

Tamás Sarlós, Xingyou Song, David P. Woodruff, Richard Zhang

2023Year
5Citations
2Top-tier citations

Abstract

Inspired by fast algorithms in natural language processing, we study low rank approximation in the entrywise transformed setting where we want to find a good rank kk approximation to f(U⋅V)f(U \cdot V), where U,V⊤∈Rn×rU, V^\top \in \mathbb{R}^{n \times r} are given, r=O(log⁡(n))r = O(\log(n)), and f(x)f(x) is a general scalar function. Previous work in sublinear low rank approximation has shown that if both (1) U=V⊤U = V^\top and (2) f(x)f(x) is a PSD kernel function, then there is an O(nkω−1)O(nk^{\omega-1}) time constant relative error approximation algorithm, where ω≈2.376\omega \approx 2.376 is the exponent of matrix multiplication. We give the first conditional time hardness results for this problem, demonstrating that both conditions (1) and (2) are in fact necessary for getting better than n2−o(1)n^{2-o(1)} time for a relative error low rank approximation for a wide class of functions. We give novel reductions from the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (SETH) that rely on lower bounding the leverage scores of flat sparse vectors and hold even when the rank of the transformed matrix f(UV)f(UV) and the target rank are no(1)n^{o(1)}, and when U=V⊤U = V^\top. Furthermore, even when f(x)=xpf(x) = x^p is a simple polynomial, we give runtime lower bounds in the case when U≠V⊤U \neq V^\top of the form Ω(min⁡(n2−o(1),Ω(2p)))\Omega(\min(n^{2-o(1)}, \Omega(2^p))). Lastly, we demonstrate that our lower bounds are tight by giving an O(n⋅poly(k,2p,1/ϵ))O(n \cdot \text{poly}(k, 2^p, 1/\epsilon)) time relative error approximation algorithm and a fast O(n⋅poly(k,p,1/ϵ))O(n \cdot \text{poly}(k, p, 1/\epsilon)) additive error approximation using fast tensor-based sketching. Additionally, since our low rank algorithms rely on matrix-vector product subroutines, our lower bounds extend to show that computing f(UV)Wf(UV)W, for even a small matrix WW, requires Ω(n2−o(1))\Omega(n^{2-o(1)}) time.

Ask about this paper

Your agent reads all of it.

Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.

Questions to start from

Your agent calls

Luneget_paper_fulltext

Ask in Lune

Free to start. No credit card required.

lune papers fulltext 33ed2dfa-a754-4f9a-bba2-74afbe983299

Cited by top-tier papers2

Ask how each one uses it

Builds on10

Related papers

Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines