Learning to Theorize the World from Observation
Doojin Baek, Gyubin Lee, Junyeob Baek, Hosung Lee, Sungjin Ahn
Abstract
What does it mean to understand the world? Contemporary world models often operationalize understanding as accurate future prediction in latent or observation space. Developmental cognitive science, however, suggests a different view: human understanding emerges through the construction of internal theories of how the world works, even before mature language is acquired. Inspired by this theory-building view of cognition, we introduce Learning-to-Theorize, a learning paradigm for inferring explicit explanatory theories of the world from raw, non-textual observations. We instantiate this paradigm with the Neural Theorizer (NEO), a probabilistic neural model that induces latent programs as a learned Language of Thought and executes them through a shared transition model. In NEO, a theory is represented as an executable, compositional program whose learned primitives can be systematically recombined to explain novel phenomena. Experiments show that this formulation enables explanation-driven generalization, allowing observations to be understood in terms of the programs that generate them.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 33c30a48-8f45-4bbc-96c4-97fd11869928Builds on13
- Dream to Control: Learning Behaviors by Latent ImaginationDanijar Hafner, Timothy P. Lillicrap, Jimmy Ba, Mohammad NorouziICLR 2020 · 1,852 citations
- Mastering Atari with Discrete World ModelsDanijar Hafner, Timothy P. Lillicrap, Mohammad Norouzi, Jimmy BaICLR 2021 · 1,170 citations
- A Benchmark for Systematic Generalization in Grounded Language UnderstandingLaura Ruis, Jacob Andreas, Marco Baroni, Diane Bouchacourt et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 169 citations
- Learning Compositional Rules via Neural Program SynthesisMaxwell I. Nye, Armando Solar-Lezama, Josh Tenenbaum, Brenden M. LakeNeurIPS 2020 · 120 citations
- Learning to Synthesize Programs as Interpretable and Generalizable PoliciesDweep Trivedi, Jesse Zhang, Shao-Hua Sun, Joseph J. LimNeurIPS 2021 · 104 citations
Related papers
- On the Emergence and Test-Time Use of Structural Information in Large Language ModelsMichelle Chao Chen, Moritz Miller, Bernhard Schölkopf, Siyuan GuoACL 2026 · 1 citation
- Beyond World Models: Rethinking Understanding in AI ModelsTarun Gupta, Danish PruthiAAAI 2026
- PIGLeT: Language Grounding Through Neuro-Symbolic Interaction in a 3D WorldRowan Zellers, Ari Holtzman, Matthew E. Peters, Roozbeh Mottaghi et al.ACL 2021
- A Domain-Specific Probabilistic Programming Language for Reasoning about Reasoning (Or: A Memo on memo)Kartik Chandra, Tony Chen, Joshua B. Tenenbaum, Jonathan Ragan-KelleyOOPSLA 2025 · 2 citations
- Neuro-Symbolic Procedural Planning with Commonsense PromptingYujie Lu, Weixi Feng, Wanrong Zhu, Wenda Xu et al.ICLR 2023 · 3 citations
