Wasserstein Distances, Neuronal Entanglement, and Sparsity
Shashata Sawmya, Linghao Kong, Ilia Markov, Dan Alistarh, Nir Shavit
Abstract
Disentangling polysemantic neurons is at the core of many current approaches to interpretability of large language models. Here we attempt to study how disentanglement can be used to understand performance, particularly under weight sparsity, a leading post-training optimization technique. We suggest a novel measure for estimating neuronal entanglement: the Wasserstein distance of a neuron's output distribution to a Gaussian. Moreover, we show the existence of a small number of highly entangled "Wasserstein Neurons" in each linear layer of an LLM, characterized by their highly non-Gaussian output distributions, their role in mapping similar inputs to dissimilar outputs, and their significant impact on model accuracy. To study these phenomena, we propose a new experimental framework for disentangling polysemantic neurons. Our framework separates each layer's inputs to create a mixture of experts where each neuron's output is computed by a mixture of neurons of lower Wasserstein distance, each better at maintaining accuracy when sparsified without retraining. We provide strong evidence that this is because the mixture of sparse experts is effectively disentangling the input-output relationship of individual neurons, in particular the difficult Wasserstein neurons.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 33a818d8-a73b-4a2b-a612-665b8e5879e9Cited by top-tier papers3
- Sparse CLIP: Co-Optimizing Interpretability and Performance in Contrastive LearningChuan Qin, Constantin Venhoff, Sonia Joseph, Fanyi Xiao et al.ICLR 2026 · 4 citations
- Negative Pre-activations Differentiate SyntaxLinghao Kong, Angelina Ning, Micah Adler, Nir N ShavitICLR 2026 · 2 citations
- Resting Neurons, Active Insights: Robustifying Activation Sparsity in LLMs via SpontaneityHaotian Xu, Jiannan Yang, Tian Gao, Lily Weng et al.ICML 2026
Builds on14
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and ScalingStella Biderman, Hailey Schoelkopf, Quentin Gregory Anthony, Herbie Bradley et al.ICML 2023 · 1,822 citations
- SparseGPT: Massive Language Models Can be Accurately Pruned in One-ShotElias Frantar, Dan AlistarhICML 2023 · 1,240 citations
- Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language ModelsRobert Huben, Hoagy Cunningham, Logan Riggs Smith, Aidan Ewart et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,072 citations
- A Simple and Effective Pruning Approach for Large Language ModelsMingjie Sun, Zhuang Liu, Anna Bair, J. Zico KolterICLR 2024 · 794 citations
Related papers
- The Expert Strikes Back: Interpreting Mixture-of-Experts Language Models at Expert LevelJeremy Herbst, Stefan Wermter, Jae Hee LeeICML 2026 · 9 citations
- Monet: Mixture of Monosemantic Experts for TransformersJungwoo Park, Ahn Young Jin, Kee-Eung Kim, Jaewoo KangICLR 2025
- Rethinking Evaluation of Sparse Autoencoders through the Representation of Polysemous WordsGouki Minegishi, Hiroki Furuta, Yusuke Iwasawa, Yutaka MatsuoICLR 2025
- Mixture of Experts Made Intrinsically InterpretableXingyi Yang, Constantin Venhoff, Ashkan Khakzar, Christian Schröder de Witt et al.ICML 2025
- Understanding Cross-layer Contributions to Mixture-of-Experts Routing in LLMsWengang Li, Lingqi Zhang, Toshio Endo, Mohamed WahibICLR 2026
