GDR-GMA: Machine Unlearning via Direction-Rectified and Magnitude-Adjusted Gradients
Shen Lin, Xiaoyu Zhang, Willy Susilo, Xiaofeng Chen, Jun Liu
Abstract
As concerns over privacy protection grow and relevant laws come into effect, machine unlearning (MU) has emerged as a pivotal research area. Due to the complexity of the forgetting data distribution, the sample-wise MU is still open challenges. Gradient ascent, as the inverse of gradient descent, is naturally applied to machine unlearning, which is also the inverse process of machine learning. However, the straightforward gradient ascent MU method suffers from the trade-off between effectiveness, fidelity, and efficiency. In this work, we analyze the gradient ascent MU process from a multi-task learning (MTL) view. This perspective reveals two problems that cause the trade-off, i.e., the gradient direction problem and the gradient dominant problem. To address these problems, we propose a novel MU method, namely GDR-GMA, consisting of Gradient Direction Rectification (GDR) and Gradient Magnitude Adjustment (GMA). For the gradient direction problem, GDR rectifies the direction between the conflicting gradients by projecting a gradient onto the orthonormal plane of the conflicting gradient. For the gradient dominant problem, GMA dynamically adjusts the magnitude of the update gradients by assigning the dynamic magnitude weight parameter to the update gradients. Furthermore, we evaluate GDR-GMA against several baseline methods in three sample-wise MU scenarios: random data forgetting, sub-class forgetting, and class forgetting. Extensive experimental results demonstrate the superior performance of GDR-GMA in effectiveness, fidelity, and efficiency
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get 335fcd0d-a23a-48a4-be8a-c6ee9c5a1b12Cited by top-tier papers9
- Learning to Unlearn While Retaining: Combating Gradient Conflicts in Machine UnlearningGaurav Patel, Qiang QiuICCV 2025 · 21 citations
- Machine Unlearning under Retain–Forget EntanglementJingpu Cheng, Ping Liu, Qianxiao Li, CHI ZHANGICLR 2026 · 11 citations
- Efficient Utility-Preserving Machine Unlearning with Implicit Gradient SurgeryShiji Zhou, Tianbai Yu, Zhi Zhang, Heng Chang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 6 citations
- Dual-Space Smoothness for Robust and Balanced LLM UnlearningHan Yan, Zheyuan Liu, Meng JiangICLR 2026 · 5 citations
- MUNBa: Machine Unlearning Via Nash BargainingJing Wu, Mehrtash HarandiICCV 2025 · 2 citations
Related papers
- Machine Unlearning via Adaptive Gradient Reweighting and Multi-stage Objective OptimizationJuxin Lu, Haoyu Shi, Mengyao Wang, Huaiwen ZhangCVPR 2026
- Label Smoothing Improves Machine UnlearningZonglin Di, Zhaowei Zhu, Jinghan Jia, Jiancheng Liu et al.ICLR 2026 · 8 citations
- Decoupling the Class Label and the Target Concept in Machine UnlearningJianing Zhu, Bo Han, Jiangchao Yao, Jianliang Xu et al.ICLR 2026 · 15 citations
- Unlearning-Aware MinimizationHoki Kim, Keonwoo Kim, Sungwon Chae, Sangwon YoonNeurIPS 2025 · 7 citations
- Forget by Uncertainty: Orthogonal Entropy Unlearning for Quantized Neural NetworksTian Zhang, Yujia Tong, Junhao Dong, Ke Xu et al.ICML 2026 · 2 citations
