Reputation Agent: Prompting Fair Reviews in Gig Markets
Carlos Toxtli, Angela Richmond-Fuller, Saiph Savage
Abstract
Our study presents a new tool, Reputation Agent, to promote fairer reviews from requesters (employers or customers) on gig markets. Unfair reviews, created when requesters consider factors outside of a worker's control, are known to plague gig workers and can result in lost job opportunities and even termination from the marketplace. Our tool leverages machine learning to implement an intelligent interface that: (1) uses deep learning to automatically detect when an individual has included unfair factors into her review (factors outside the worker's control per the policies of the market); and (2) prompts the individual to reconsider her review if she has incorporated unfair factors. To study the effectiveness of Reputation Agent, we conducted a controlled experiment over different gig markets. Our experiment illustrates that across markets, Reputation Agent, in contrast with traditional approaches, motivates requesters to review gig workers' performance more fairly. We discuss how tools that bring more transparency to employers about the policies of a gig market can help build empathy thus resulting in reasoned discussions around potential injustices towards workers generated by these interfaces. Our vision is that with tools that promote truth and transparency we can bring fairer treatment to gig workers.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 3323a5cf-01f8-4ea2-865d-a7b2face27f0Cited by top-tier papers7
- Rethinking "Risk" in Algorithmic Systems Through A Computational Narrative Analysis of Casenotes in Child-WelfareDevansh Saxena, Erina Seh-Young Moon, Aryan Chaurasia, Yixin Guan et al.CHI 2023 · 35 citations
- I Want to, but First I Need to: Understanding Crowdworkers' Career Goals, Challenges, and TensionsVeronica A. Rivera, David T. LeeCSCW 2021 · 25 citations
- Situating Empathy in HCI/CSCW: A Scoping ReviewUgur Genç, Himanshu VermaCSCW 2024 · 25 citations
- Not Just A Dot on The Map: Food Delivery Workers as InfrastructureRiyaj Isamiya Shaikh, Anubha Singh, Barry Brown, Airi LampinenCHI 2024 · 17 citations
- The Influences of Task Design on Crowdsourced Judgement: A Case Study of Recidivism Risk EvaluationXiaoni Duan, Chien-Ju Ho, Ming YinWWW 2022 · 16 citations
Related papers
- How Much Do Platform Workers Value Reviews? An Experimental MethodDavid M. Holtz, Liane Scult, Siddharth SuriCHI 2022 · 7 citations
- HirePeer: Impartial Peer-Assessed Hiring at Scale in Expert Crowdsourcing MarketsYasmine Kotturi, Anson Kahng, Ariel D. Procaccia, Chinmay KulkarniAAAI 2020 · 15 citations
- Equal Merit Does Not Imply Equality: Discrimination at Equilibrium in a Hiring Market with Symmetric AgentsSerafina Kamp, Benjamin FishAAAI 2025 · 1 citation
- Incorporating Worker Perspectives into MTurk Annotation Practices for NLPOlivia Huang, Eve Fleisig, Dan KleinEMNLP 2023 · 1 citation
- When AI Agents Compete for Jobs: Strategic Capabilities and Economic Dynamics of AI Labour MarketsChris Chiu, Simpson Zhang, Mihaela van der SchaarICML 2026
