Quantifying Security Training in Organizations Through the Analysis of U.S. SEC 10-K Filings
Jonas Hielscher, Maximilian Golla
Abstract
The Security Awareness and Training (SAT) market exceeds multiple billion dollars annually, yet reliable data on organizational adoption remains scarce. Conflicting, survey-based figures from cybersecurity vendors leave researchers and decision-makers reliant on questionable insights. A new U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) regulation, effective since late 2023, requires companies to disclose cybersecurity strategies in annual Form 10-K filings, offering a more consistent data source. In this study, we crawl and analyze filings from 5,286 U.S. companies across diverse sectors and sizes, using keyword searches and thematic analysis, which offers a lower-bound estimate of prevalent topics. We find that 78% of companies report implementing SAT and 27% conduct phishing simulations, with adoption varying significantly by sector and size. Larger companies report more extensive SAT efforts, often aligned with standards like NIST CSF. While multi-factor authentication (11%) is the most common employee-facing security control, many filings frame employees as a risk factor. Our findings help organizations critically assess SAT strategies and vendor claims, offer actionable insights for policymakers, and equip scholars with a coded dataset and crawling tools for ongoing longitudinal analysis.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on19
- SoK: Science, Security and the Elusive Goal of Security as a Scientific PursuitCormac Herley, Paul C. van OorschotS&P 2017 · 95 citations
- Phishing in Organizations: Findings from a Large-Scale and Long-Term StudyDaniele Lain, Kari Kostiainen, Srdjan CapkunS&P 2022 · 92 citations
- Privacy Legislation as Business Risks: How GDPR and CCPA are Represented in Technology Companies' Investment Risk DisclosuresRichmond Y. Wong, Andrew Chong, R. Cooper AspegrenCSCW 2023 · 56 citations
- How Does Usable Security (Not) End Up in Software Products? Results From a Qualitative Interview StudyMarco Gutfleisch, Jan H. Klemmer, Niklas Busch, Yasemin Acar et al.S&P 2022 · 51 citations
- SoK: Cyber Insurance - Technical Challenges and a System Security RoadmapSavino Dambra, Leyla Bilge, Davide BalzarottiS&P 2020 · 47 citations
Related papers
- Selling Satisfaction: A Qualitative Analysis of Cybersecurity Awareness Vendors' PromisesJonas Hielscher, Markus Schöps, Jens Opdenbusch, Felix Reichmann et al.CCS 2024 · 4 citations
- Understanding the Efficacy of Phishing Training in PracticeGrant Ho, Ariana Mirian, Elisa Luo, Khang Tong et al.S&P 2025
- Anti-Phishing Training (Still) Does Not Work: A Reproduction of Phishing Training Inefficacy Grounded in the NIST Phish ScaleAndrew T. Rozema, James C. DavisWWW 2026 · 1 citation
- A Large-Scale Interview Study on Information Security in and Attacks against Small and Medium-sized EnterprisesNicolas Huaman, Bennet von Skarczinski, Christian Stransky, Dominik Wermke et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 30 citations
- "What Keeps People Secure is That They Met The Security Team": Deconstructing Drivers And Goals of Organizational Security AwarenessJonas Hielscher, Simon ParkinUSENIX Security 2024 · 7 citations
