Escaping Saddle Points with Bias-Variance Reduced Local Perturbed SGD for Communication Efficient Nonconvex Distributed Learning
Tomoya Murata, Taiji Suzuki
Abstract
In recent centralized nonconvex distributed learning and federated learning, local methods are one of the promising approaches to reduce communication time. However, existing work has mainly focused on studying first-order optimality guarantees. On the other side, second-order optimality guaranteed algorithms, i.e., algorithms escaping saddle points, have been extensively studied in the non-distributed optimization literature. In this paper, we study a new local algorithm called Bias-Variance Reduced Local Perturbed SGD (BVR-L-PSGD), that combines the existing bias-variance reduced gradient estimator with parameter perturbation to find second-order optimal points in centralized nonconvex distributed optimization. BVR-L-PSGD enjoys second-order optimality with nearly the same communication complexity as the best known one of BVR-L-SGD to find first-order optimality. Particularly, the communication complexity is better than non-local methods when the local datasets heterogeneity is smaller than the smoothness of the local loss. In an extreme case, the communication complexity approaches to when the local datasets heterogeneity goes to zero. Numerical results validate our theoretical findings.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 330c2008-badf-4467-8e13-284f8b9b58c0Cited by top-tier papers3
- Second-Order Convergence in Private Stochastic Non-Convex OptimizationYouming Tao, Zuyuan Zhang, Dongxiao Yu, Xiuzhen Cheng et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 4 citations
- SILVER: Single-loop variance reduction and application to federated learningKazusato Oko, Shunta Akiyama, Denny Wu, Tomoya Murata et al.ICML 2024 · 2 citations
- ShapCCS: Shapley-Driven Client Coreset Selection in Federated LearningShuo Ji, Jie Hu, Zhouqiao He, Zijie Zhao et al.ICML 2026
Builds on5
- SCAFFOLD: Stochastic Controlled Averaging for Federated LearningSai Praneeth Karimireddy, Satyen Kale, Mehryar Mohri, Sashank J. Reddi et al.ICML 2020 · 3,875 citations
- A Unified Theory of Decentralized SGD with Changing Topology and Local UpdatesAnastasia Koloskova, Nicolas Loizou, Sadra Boreiri, Martin Jaggi et al.ICML 2020 · 623 citations
- Is Local SGD Better than Minibatch SGD?Blake E. Woodworth, Kumar Kshitij Patel, Sebastian U. Stich, Zhen Dai et al.ICML 2020 · 277 citations
- Minibatch vs Local SGD for Heterogeneous Distributed LearningBlake E. Woodworth, Kumar Kshitij Patel, Nati SrebroNeurIPS 2020 · 231 citations
- Bias-Variance Reduced Local SGD for Less Heterogeneous Federated LearningTomoya Murata, Taiji SuzukiICML 2021 · 61 citations
Related papers
- Distributed Training with Heterogeneous Data: Bridging Median- and Mean-Based AlgorithmsXiangyi Chen, Tiancong Chen, Haoran Sun, Zhiwei Steven Wu et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 90 citations
- Revisiting Consensus Error: A Fine-grained Analysis of Local SGD under Second-order Data HeterogeneityKumar Kshitij Patel, Ali Zindari, Sebastian U. Stich, Lingxiao WangNeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation
- Communication Efficient Distributed Newton Method with Fast Convergence RatesChengchang Liu, Lesi Chen, Luo Luo, John C. S. LuiKDD 2023 · 4 citations
- Finding Local Minima Efficiently in Decentralized OptimizationWenhan Xian, Heng HuangNeurIPS 2023 · 1 citation
- Tackling Data Heterogeneity: A New Unified Framework for Decentralized SGD with Sample-induced TopologyYan Huang, Ying Sun, Zehan Zhu, Changzhi Yan et al.ICML 2022 · 18 citations
