OpDiffer: LLM-Assisted Opcode-Level Differential Testing of Ethereum Virtual Machine
Jie Ma, Ningyu He, Jinwen Xi, Mingzhe Xing, Haoyu Wang, Ying Gao, Yinliang Yue
Abstract
As Ethereum continues to thrive, the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) has become the cornerstone powering tens of millions of active smart contracts. Intuitively, security issues in EVMs could lead to inconsistent behaviors among smart contracts or even denial-of-service of the entire blockchain network. However, to the best of our knowledge, only a limited number of studies focus on the security of EVMs. Moreover, they suffer from 1) insufficient test input diversity and invalid semantics; and 2) the inability to automatically identify bugs and locate root causes. To bridge this gap, we propose OpDiffer, a differential testing framework for EVM, which takes advantage of LLMs and static analysis methods to address the above two limitations. We conducted the largest-scale evaluation, covering nine EVMs and uncovering 26 previously unknown bugs, 22 of which have been confirmed by developers and three have been assigned CNVD IDs. Compared to state-of-the-art baselines, OpDiffer can improve code coverage by at most 71.06%, 148.40% and 655.56%, respectively. Through an analysis of real-world deployed Ethereum contracts, we estimate that 7.21% of the contracts could trigger our identified EVM bugs under certain environmental settings, potentially resulting in severe negative impact on the Ethereum ecosystem. CCS Concepts: • Software and its engineering → Software testing and debugging; • Security and privacy → Software security engineering.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 32a9fff9-eec3-4252-96c9-4e1b40ccc2cfCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on26
- Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-FeedbackAman Madaan, Niket Tandon, Prakhar Gupta, Skyler Hallinan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 4,972 citations
- Securify: Practical Security Analysis of Smart ContractsPetar Tsankov, Andrei Marian Dan, Dana Drachsler-Cohen, Arthur Gervais et al.CCS 2018 · 1,108 citations
- NEZHA: Efficient Domain-Independent Differential TestingTheofilos Petsios, Adrian Tang, Salvatore J. Stolfo, Angelos D. Keromytis et al.S&P 2017 · 132 citations
- GPTScan: Detecting Logic Vulnerabilities in Smart Contracts by Combining GPT with Program AnalysisYuqiang Sun, Daoyuan Wu, Yue Xue, Han Liu et al.ICSE 2024 · 131 citations
- Make LLM a Testing Expert: Bringing Human-like Interaction to Mobile GUI Testing via Functionality-aware DecisionsZhe Liu, Chunyang Chen, Junjie Wang, Mengzhuo Chen et al.ICSE 2024 · 81 citations
Related papers
- Empirical review of automated analysis tools on 47, 587 Ethereum smart contractsThomas Durieux, João F. Ferreira, Rui Abreu, Pedro CruzICSE 2020 · 373 citations
- Finding Consensus Bugs in Ethereum via Multi-transaction Differential FuzzingYoungseok Yang, Taesoo Kim, Byung-Gon ChunOSDI 2021 · 57 citations
- Making Smart Contracts SmarterLoi Luu, Duc-Hiep Chu, Hrishi Olickel, Prateek Saxena et al.CCS 2016 · 2,306 citations
- EtherDiffer: Differential Testing on RPC Services of Ethereum NodesShinhae Kim, Sungjae HwangFSE 2023 · 13 citations
- WADIFF: A Differential Testing Framework for WebAssembly RuntimesShiyao Zhou, Muhui Jiang, Weimin Chen, Hao Zhou et al.ASE 2023 · 14 citations
