Lost in Transmission: When and Why LLMs Fail to Reason Globally
Tobias Schnabel, Kiran Tomlinson, Adith Swaminathan, Jennifer Neville
Abstract
Despite their many successes, transformer-based large language models (LLMs) continue to struggle with tasks that require complex reasoning over large parts of their input. We argue that these failures arise due to capacity limits on the accurate flow of information within LLMs. To formalize this issue, we introduce the bounded attention prefix oracle (BAPO) model, a new computational framework that models bandwidth constraints on attention heads, the mechanism for internal communication in LLMs. We show that several important reasoning problems like graph reachability require high communication bandwidth for BAPOs to solve; we call these problems BAPO-hard. Our experiments corroborate our theoretical predictions: GPT-4o, Claude, and Gemini succeed on BAPO-easy tasks and fail even on relatively small BAPO-hard tasks. BAPOs also reveal another benefit of chain of thought (CoT): we prove that breaking down a task using CoT can turn any BAPO-hard problem into a BAPO-easy one. Our results offer principled explanations for key LLM failures and suggest directions for architectures and inference methods that mitigate bandwidth limits.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 32a01140-0f27-44da-97f1-c306624c1b59Cited by top-tier papers2
- Reasoning about Reasoning: BAPO Bounds on Chain-of-Thought Token Complexity in LLMsKiran Tomlinson, Tobias Schnabel, Adith Swaminathan, Jennifer NevilleICML 2026 · 2 citations
- Curriculum-Guided Layer Scaling for Language Model PretrainingKaranpartap Singh, Neil Band, Ehsan AdeliICML 2026
Builds on19
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP TasksPatrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 19,162 citations
- Faith and Fate: Limits of Transformers on CompositionalityNouha Dziri, Ximing Lu, Melanie Sclar, Xiang Lorraine Li et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 728 citations
- Towards Revealing the Mystery behind Chain of Thought: A Theoretical PerspectiveGuhao Feng, Bohang Zhang, Yuntian Gu, Haotian Ye et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 470 citations
- The Expressive Power of Transformers with Chain of ThoughtWilliam Merrill, Ashish SabharwalICLR 2024 · 243 citations
Related papers
- LongCoT: Benchmarking Long-Horizon Chain-of-Thought ReasoningSumeet Motwani, Daniel Nichols, Charles London, Peggy Li et al.ICML 2026 · 2 citations
- Analyzing the Power of Chain of Thought through Memorization CapabilitiesLijia Yu, Xiao-Shan Gao, Lijun ZhangNeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
- Reasoning by Superposition: A Theoretical Perspective on Chain of Continuous ThoughtHanlin Zhu, Shibo Hao, Zhiting Hu, Jiantao Jiao et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 86 citations
- Mapping the Minds of LLMs: A Graph-Based Analysis of Reasoning LLMsZhen Xiong, Yujun Cai, Zhecheng Li, Yiwei WangEMNLP 2025
- Chain-of-Thought Provably Enables Learning the (Otherwise) UnlearnableChenxiao Yang, Zhiyuan Li, David WipfICLR 2025
