RL makes MLLMs see better than SFT
Junha Song, Sangdoo Yun, Dongyoon Han, Jaegul Choo, Byeongho Heo
Abstract
A dominant assumption in Multimodal Language Model (MLLM) research is that its performance is largely inherited from the LLM backbone, given its immense parameter scale and remarkable capabilities. This has created a void in the understanding of the vision encoder, which determines how MLLMs perceive images. The recent shift in MLLM training paradigms, from Supervised Finetuning (SFT) to Reinforcement Learning (RL), magnifies this oversight-namely, the significant lack of analysis on how such training reshapes the vision encoder as well as the MLLM. To address this, we first investigate the impact of training strategies on MLLMs, where RL shows a clear advantage over SFT in strongly vision-related VQA benchmarks. Motivated by this, we conduct a critical yet under-explored analysis of the vision encoder of MLLMs through diverse and in-depth experiments, ranging from ImageNet classification and segmentation to gradient visualization. Our results demonstrate that MLLM's post-training strategy (i.e., SFT or RL) not only leads to distinct outcomes on MLLM downstream tasks, but also fundamentally reshapes MLLM's underlying visual representations. Specifically, the key finding of our study is that RL produces stronger and precisely localized visual representations compared to SFT, boosting the ability of the vision encoder for MLLM. We then reframe our findings into a simple recipe for building strong vision encoders for MLLMs, Preference-Instructed Vision OpTimization (PIVOT). When integrated into MLLMs, a PIVOT-trained vision encoder outperforms even larger and more heavily-trained counterparts, despite requiring less than 1% of the computational cost of standard vision pretraining. This result opens an effective and efficient path for advancing the vision backbones of MLLMs. Project page available at https://june-page.github.io/pivot/
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 3288ea50-9a88-4476-9144-4353ae7bb9c4Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on50
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual RepresentationsTing Chen, Simon Kornblith, Mohammad Norouzi, Geoffrey E. HintonICML 2020 · 24,064 citations
- An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at ScaleAlexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn et al.ICLR 2021 · 21,477 citations
Related papers
- Learn to Think: Improving Multimodal Reasoning through Vision-Aware Self-Improvement TrainingQihuang Zhong, Liang Ding, Wenjie Xuan, Juhua Liu et al.ICML 2026 · 1 citation
- RePIC: Reinforced Post-Training for Personalizing Multi-Modal Language ModelsYeongtak Oh, Dohyun Chung, Juhyeon Shin, Sangha Park et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 12 citations
- Elevating Visual Perception in Multimodal LLMs with Visual Embedding DistillationJitesh Jain, Zhengyuan Yang, Humphrey Shi, Jianfeng Gao et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 9 citations
- MergeMix: A Unified Augmentation Paradigm for Visual and Multi-Modal UnderstandingXin Jin, Siyuan Li, Siyong Jian, Kai Yu et al.ICLR 2026 · 14 citations
- Visual Jigsaw Post-Training Improves MLLMsPenghao Wu, Yushan Zhang, Haiwen Diao, Bo Li et al.ICLR 2026 · 25 citations
