USENIX Security2023Top-tier venue
Cryptographic Administration for Secure Group Messaging
David Balbás, Daniel Collins, Serge Vaudenay
Abstract
Many real-world group messaging systems delegate group administration to the application level, failing to provide formal guarantees related to group membership. Taking a cryptographic approach to group administration can prevent both implementation and protocol design pitfalls that result in a loss of confidentiality and consistency for group members. In this work, we introduce a cryptographic framework for the design of group messaging protocols that offer strong security guarantees for group membership. To this end, we extend the continuous group key agreement (CGKA) paradigm used in the ongoing IETF MLS group messaging standardisation process and introduce the administrated CGKA (A-CGKA) primitive. Our primitive natively enables a subset of group members, the group admins, to control the addition and removal of parties and to update their own keying material in a secure manner. Notably, our security model prevents even corrupted (non-admin) members from forging messages that modify group membership. Moreover, we present two efficient and modular constructions of group administrators that are correct and secure with respect to our definitions. Finally, we propose, implement, and benchmark an efficient extension of MLS that integrates cryptographic administrators.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 31b5fd3a-e9c6-4a81-8cb7-f13afdba3b94Cited by top-tier papers5
- Private Hierarchical Governance for Encrypted MessagingArmin Namavari, Barry Wang, Sanketh Menda, Ben Nassi et al.S&P 2024 · 1 citation
- End-to-End Encrypted Git ServicesYa-Nan Li, Yaqing Song, Qiang Tang, Moti YungCCS 2025 · 1 citation
- Bots can Snoop: Uncovering and Mitigating Privacy Risks of Bots in Group ChatsKai-Hsiang Chou, Yi-Min Lin, Yi-An Wang, Jonathan Weiping Li et al.USENIX Security 2025
- End-to-End Encrypted Collaborative DocumentsChristian Knabenhans, Zayd Maradni, Carmela TroncosoUSENIX Security 2026
- Exploring How to Authenticate Application Messages in MLS: More Efficient, Post-Quantum, and Anonymous BlocklistableKeitaro Hashimoto, Shuichi Katsumata, Guillermo Pascual-PerezUSENIX Security 2025
Builds on10
- On Ends-to-Ends Encryption: Asynchronous Group Messaging with Strong Security GuaranteesKatriel Cohn-Gordon, Cas Cremers, Luke Garratt, Jon Millican et al.CCS 2018 · 140 citations
- Keep the Dirt: Tainted TreeKEM, Adaptively and Actively Secure Continuous Group Key AgreementKaren Klein, Guillermo Pascual-Perez, Michael Walter, Chethan Kamath et al.S&P 2021 · 46 citations
- On the Insider Security of MLSJoël Alwen, Daniel Jost, Marta MularczykCRYPTO 2022 · 28 citations
- Security Analysis of the MLS Key DerivationChris Brzuska, Eric Cornelissen, Konrad KohbrokS&P 2022 · 26 citations
- CoCoA: Concurrent Continuous Group Key AgreementJoël Alwen, Benedikt Auerbach, Miguel Cueto Noval, Karen Klein et al.EUROCRYPT 2022 · 26 citations
Related papers
- Modular Design of Secure Group Messaging Protocols and the Security of MLSJoël Alwen, Sandro Coretti, Yevgeniy Dodis, Yiannis TselekounisCCS 2021 · 1 citation
- Fork-Resilient Continuous Group Key AgreementJoël Alwen, Marta Mularczyk, Yiannis TselekounisCRYPTO 2023 · 14 citations
- Quarantined-TreeKEM: A Continuous Group Key Agreement for MLS, Secure in Presence of Inactive UsersCéline Chevalier, Guirec Lebrun, Ange Martinelli, Abdul Rahman TalebCCS 2024 · 1 citation
- Key Agreement for Decentralized Secure Group Messaging with Strong Security GuaranteesMatthew Weidner, Martin Kleppmann, Daniel Hugenroth, Alastair R. BeresfordCCS 2021 · 28 citations
- Server-Aided Continuous Group Key AgreementJoël Alwen, Dominik Hartmann, Eike Kiltz, Marta MularczykCCS 2022 · 19 citations
