Inherently Interpretable Time Series Classification via Multiple Instance Learning
Joseph Early, Gavin K. C. Cheung, Kurt Cutajar, Hanting Xie, Jas Kandola, Niall Twomey
Abstract
Conventional Time Series Classification (TSC) methods are often black boxes that obscure inherent interpretation of their decision-making processes. In this work, we leverage Multiple Instance Learning (MIL) to overcome this issue, and propose a new framework called MILLET: Multiple Instance Learning for Locally Explainable Time series classification. We apply MILLET to existing deep learning TSC models and show how they become inherently interpretable without compromising (and in some cases, even improving) predictive performance. We evaluate MILLET on 85 UCR TSC datasets and also present a novel synthetic dataset that is specially designed to facilitate interpretability evaluation. On these datasets, we show MILLET produces sparse explanations quickly that are of higher quality than other well-known interpretability methods. To the best of our knowledge, our work with MILLET, which is available on GitHub (https://github.com/JAEarly/MILTimeSeriesClassification), is the first to develop general MIL methods for TSC and apply them to an extensive variety of domains
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers21
- TimeMIL: Advancing Multivariate Time Series Classification via a Time-aware Multiple Instance LearningXiwen Chen, Peijie Qiu, Wenhui Zhu, Huayu Li et al.ICML 2024 · 31 citations
- Are Multiple Instance Learning Algorithms Learnable for Instances?Jaeseok Jang, Hyuk-Yoon KwonNeurIPS 2024 · 13 citations
- CALANet: Cheap All-Layer Aggregation for Human Activity RecognitionJaegyun Park, Dae-Won Kim, Jaesung LeeNeurIPS 2024 · 11 citations
- ShapeX: Shapelet-Driven Post Hoc Explanations for Time Series Classification ModelsBosong Huang, Ming Jin, Yuxuan Liang, Johan Barthelemy et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 8 citations
- Not All Data are Good Labels: On the Self-supervised Labeling for Time Series ForecastingYuxuan Yang, Dalin Zhang, Yuxuan Liang, Hua Lu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 5 citations
Builds on8
- Benchmarking Deep Learning Interpretability in Time Series PredictionsAya Abdelsalam Ismail, Mohamed K. Gunady, Héctor Corrada Bravo, Soheil FeiziNeurIPS 2020 · 249 citations
- Additive MIL: Intrinsically Interpretable Multiple Instance Learning for PathologySyed Ashar Javed, Dinkar Juyal, Harshith Padigela, Amaro Taylor-Weiner et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 124 citations
- Explaining Time Series Predictions with Dynamic MasksJonathan Crabbé, Mihaela van der SchaarICML 2021 · 115 citations
- Encoding Time-Series Explanations through Self-Supervised Model Behavior ConsistencyOwen Queen, Tom Hartvigsen, Teddy Koker, Huan He et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 55 citations
- Non-Markovian Reward Modelling from Trajectory Labels via Interpretable Multiple Instance LearningJoseph Early, Tom Bewley, Christine Evers, Sarvapali D. RamchurnNeurIPS 2022 · 22 citations
Related papers
- Counterfactual eXplainable AI (XAI) Method for Deep Learning-Based Multivariate Time Series ClassificationAlan G. Paredes Cetina, Kaouther Benguessoum, Raoni Lourenço, Sylvain KublerAAAI 2026
- Extracting Explainable Temporal Features in Multivariate Time Series Classification PipelinesIdo Ikar, Amit SomechKDD 2026
- TimeSAE: Causal Sparse Decoding for Faithful Explanations of Black-Box Time Series ModelsKhalid Oublal, Quentin Bouniot, Qi Gan, Stephan Clemencon et al.ICML 2026 · 2 citations
- SI-MIL: Taming Deep MIL for Self-Interpretability in Gigapixel HistopathologySaarthak Kapse, Pushpak Pati, Srijan Das, Jingwei Zhang et al.CVPR 2024
- Self-Interpretable Time Series Prediction with Counterfactual ExplanationsJingquan Yan, Hao WangICML 2023 · 29 citations
