Geodesic Forests
Meghana Madhyastha, Gongkai Li, Veronika Strnadová-Neeley, James Browne, Joshua T. Vogelstein, Randal C. Burns, Carey E. Priebe
Abstract
Together with the curse of dimensionality, nonlinear dependencies in large data sets persist as major challenges in data mining tasks. A reliable way to accurately preserve nonlinear structure is to compute geodesic distances between data points. Manifold learning methods, such as Isomap, aim to preserve geodesic distances in a Riemannian manifold. However, as manifold learning algorithms operate on the ambient dimensionality of the data, the essential step of geodesic distance computation is sensitive to high-dimensional noise. Therefore, a direct application of these algorithms to high-dimensional, noisy data often yields unsatisfactory results and does not accurately capture nonlinear structure.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Related papers
- Matrix factorisation and the interpretation of geodesic distanceNick Whiteley, Annie Gray, Patrick Rubin-DelanchyNeurIPS 2021 · 14 citations
- A Heat Diffusion Perspective on Geodesic Preserving Dimensionality ReductionGuillaume Huguet, Alexander Tong, Edward De Brouwer, Yanlei Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 14 citations
- GeoMM: On Geodesic Perspective for Multi-modal LearningShibin Mei, Hang Wang, Bingbing NiCVPR 2025
- Graph Geometry-Preserving AutoencodersJungbin Lim, Jihwan Kim, Yonghyeon Lee, Cheongjae Jang et al.ICML 2024 · 10 citations
- Unified K-Means Clustering with Label-Guided Manifold LearningQianqian Wang, Mengping Jiang, Zhengming Ding, Quanxue GaoICML 2025
