TS: Training with Sparsemax+, Testing with Softmax for Accurate and Diverse LLM Fine-Tuning
Ziyang Xu, Ananthu Rajendran Pillai, Yinghua Yao, Yuangang Pan
Abstract
Large Language Models typically rely on Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) with Cross-Entropy (CE) loss to specialize in downstream tasks. However, CE forces the distribution toward one-hot targets and ignores alternative continuations, thereby limiting output diversity, a key drawback for generative applications that rely on sampling-based exploration. In this paper, we propose ``Training with Sparsemax, Testing with Softmax (TS)''. Intuitively, sparsemax and its tailored loss mask the gradients of probabilities outside the support set, leaving excessive probability mass on irrelevant tail classes when evaluating with softmax. To address this issue, we propose an improved variant, Sparsemax, for training, which augments the sparsemax loss with a suppression term that penalizes the out-of-support probabilities. At testing, we decode with softmax, yielding calibrated, non-degenerate probabilities where plausible near-ties survive. We fine-tuned Llama-3.1-8B and Qwen-2.5-7B with TS, achieving consistent improvements in accuracy and output diversity across chat, code, and open-domain benchmarks. Together, these results demonstrate that TS provides a practical, drop-in solution for fine-tuning LLMs that are both more accurate and more creative. The code is available at https://github.com/xzy-bit/TS-2-ICLR-2026.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 2ffe5ae4-707c-4e33-9152-66e4b10baf4bBuilds on12
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- The Curious Case of Neural Text DegenerationAri Holtzman, Jan Buys, Li Du, Maxwell Forbes et al.ICLR 2020 · 4,112 citations
- Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code GenerationJiawei Liu, Chunqiu Steven Xia, Yuyao Wang, Lingming ZhangNeurIPS 2023 · 2,317 citations
- AlpacaFarm: A Simulation Framework for Methods that Learn from Human FeedbackYann Dubois, Chen Xuechen Li, Rohan Taori, Tianyi Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 948 citations
Related papers
- Preserving Diversity in Supervised Fine-Tuning of Large Language ModelsZiniu Li, Congliang Chen, Tian Xu, Zeyu Qin et al.ICLR 2025
- G2: Guided Generation for Enhanced Output Diversity in LLMsZhiwen Ruan, Yixia Li, Yefeng Liu, Yun Chen et al.EMNLP 2025
- Self-Distillation Bridges Distribution Gap in Language Model Fine-TuningZhaorui Yang, Tianyu Pang, Haozhe Feng, Han Wang et al.ACL 2024
- DRIFT: Difference-Aware Reinforcement Through Iterative Fine-Tuning for Language ModelWenjie Liao, Xiaohui Song, Haonan LuAAAI 2026 · 1 citation
- Logits-Based FinetuningJingyao Li, Senqiao Yang, Sitong Wu, Han Shi et al.EMNLP 2025
