One LR Doesn’t Fit All: Heavy-Tail Guided Layerwise Learning Rates for LLMs
Di He, Songjun Tu, Keyu Wang, Lu Yin, Shiwei Liu
Abstract
Learning rate configuration is a fundamental aspect of modern deep learning. The prevailing practice of applying a uniform learning rate across all layers overlooks the structural heterogeneity of Transformers, potentially limiting their effectiveness as the backbone of Large Language Models (LLMs). In this paper, we introduce Layerwise Learning Rate (LLR), an adaptive scheme that assigns distinct learning rates to individual Transformer layers. Our method is grounded in Heavy-Tailed Self-Regularization (HT-SR) theory, which characterizes the empirical spectral density (ESD) of weight correlation matrices to quantify heavy-tailedness. Layers with weaker heavy-tailedness are assigned larger learning rates to accelerate their training, while layers with stronger heavy-tailedness receive smaller learning rates. By tailoring learning rates in this manner, LLR promotes balanced training across layers, leading to faster convergence and improved generalization. Extensive experiments across architectures (from LLaMa to GPT-nano), optimizers (AdamW and Muon), and parameter scales (60M–3B, up to 100B tokens) demonstrate that LLR achieves up to 1.5× training speedup and outperforms baselines, notably raising average zero-shot accuracy from 47.09% to 49.02% for 1B models and from 48.58% to 50.61% for 3B models. A key advantage of LLR is its low tuning overhead: it transfers nearly optimal LR settings directly from the uniform baseline. Code is available at https://github.com/hed-ucas/Layer-wise-Learning-Rate.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 2ffdbf59-a239-4316-971a-c8c01ac9ccbeCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on13
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- WinoGrande: An Adversarial Winograd Schema Challenge at ScaleKeisuke Sakaguchi, Ronan Le Bras, Chandra Bhagavatula, Yejin ChoiAAAI 2020 · 3,037 citations
- PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural LanguageYonatan Bisk, Rowan Zellers, Ronan Le Bras, Jianfeng Gao et al.AAAI 2020 · 2,916 citations
- LLM-Adapters: An Adapter Family for Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning of Large Language ModelsZhiqiang Hu, Lei Wang, Yihuai Lan, Wanyu Xu et al.EMNLP 2023 · 200 citations
Related papers
- AlphaDecay: Module-wise Weight Decay for Heavy-Tailed Balancing in LLMsDi He, Songjun Tu, Ajay Jaiswal, Li Shen et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 14 citations
- The Sharpness Disparity Principle in Transformers for Accelerating Language Model Pre-TrainingJinbo Wang, Mingze Wang, Zhanpeng Zhou, Junchi Yan et al.ICML 2025
- AlphaPruning: Using Heavy-Tailed Self Regularization Theory for Improved Layer-wise Pruning of Large Language ModelsHaiquan Lu, Yefan Zhou, Shiwei Liu, Zhangyang Wang et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 49 citations
- Temperature Balancing, Layer-wise Weight Analysis, and Neural Network TrainingYefan Zhou, Tianyu Pang, Keqin Liu, Charles H. Martin et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 29 citations
- Model Balancing Helps Low-data Training and Fine-tuningZihang Liu, Yuanzhe Hu, Tianyu Pang, Yefan Zhou et al.EMNLP 2024 · 2 citations
