Differential Privacy has Bounded Impact on Fairness in Classification
Paul Mangold, Michaël Perrot, Aurélien Bellet, Marc Tommasi
Abstract
We theoretically study the impact of differential privacy on fairness in classification. We prove that, given a class of models, popular group fairness measures are pointwise Lipschitz-continuous with respect to the parameters of the model. This result is a consequence of a more general statement on accuracy conditioned on an arbitrary event (such as membership to a sensitive group), which may be of independent interest. We use this Lipschitz property to prove a non-asymptotic bound showing that, as the number of samples increases, the fairness level of private models gets closer to the one of their non-private counterparts. This bound also highlights the importance of the confidence margin of a model on the disparate impact of differential privacy.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers3
- The Tug of War Within: Mitigating the Fairness-Privacy Conflicts in Large Language ModelsChen Qian, Dongrui Liu, Jie Zhang, Yong Liu et al.ACL 2025 · 3 citations
- Certified Defense on the Fairness of Graph Neural NetworksYushun Dong, Binchi Zhang, Hanghang Tong, Jundong LiKDD 2026 · 3 citations
- Private Rate-Constrained Optimization with Applications to Fair LearningMohammad Yaghini, Tudor Cebere, Michael Menart, Aurélien Bellet et al.ICLR 2026
Builds on8
- Deep Learning with Differential PrivacyMartín Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian J. Goodfellow, H. Brendan McMahan et al.CCS 2016 · 7,620 citations
- Retiring Adult: New Datasets for Fair Machine LearningFrances Ding, Moritz Hardt, John Miller, Ludwig SchmidtNeurIPS 2021 · 671 citations
- Differentially Private and Fair Deep Learning: A Lagrangian Dual ApproachCuong Tran, Ferdinando Fioretto, Pascal Van HentenryckAAAI 2021 · 90 citations
- Fair Learning with Private Demographic DataHussein Mozannar, Mesrob I. Ohannessian, Nathan SrebroICML 2020 · 85 citations
- Too Relaxed to Be FairMichael Lohaus, Michaël Perrot, Ulrike von LuxburgICML 2020 · 80 citations
Related papers
- Removing Disparate Impact on Model Accuracy in Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient DescentDepeng Xu, Wei Du, Xintao WuKDD 2021 · 32 citations
- Differentially Private Empirical Risk Minimization under the Fairness LensCuong Tran, My H. Dinh, Ferdinando FiorettoNeurIPS 2021 · 61 citations
- Disparate Impact in Differential Privacy from Gradient MisalignmentMaria S. Esipova, Atiyeh Ashari Ghomi, Yaqiao Luo, Jesse C. CresswellICLR 2023 · 7 citations
- On the Alignment between Fairness and Accuracy: from the Perspective of Adversarial RobustnessJunyi Chai, Taeuk Jang, Jing Gao, Xiaoqian WangICML 2025
- Robin Hood and Matthew Effects: Differential Privacy Has Disparate Impact on Synthetic DataGeorgi Ganev, Bristena Oprisanu, Emiliano De CristofaroICML 2022 · 78 citations
