Lyapunov Density Models: Constraining Distribution Shift in Learning-Based Control
Katie Kang, Paula Gradu, Jason J. Choi, Michael Janner, Claire J. Tomlin, Sergey Levine
Abstract
Learned models and policies can generalize effectively when evaluated within the distribution of the training data, but can produce unpredictable and erroneous outputs on out-of-distribution inputs. In order to avoid distribution shift when deploying learning-based control algorithms, we seek a mechanism to constrain the agent to states and actions that resemble those that it was trained on. In control theory, Lyapunov stability and control-invariant sets allow us to make guarantees about controllers that stabilize the system around specific states, while in machine learning, density models allow us to estimate the training data distribution. Can we combine these two concepts, producing learning-based control algorithms that constrain the system to in-distribution states using only in-distribution actions? In this work, we propose to do this by combining concepts from Lyapunov stability and density estimation, introducing Lyapunov density models: a generalization of control Lyapunov functions and density models that provides guarantees on an agent's ability to stay in-distribution over its entire trajectory.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers7
- VOCE: Variational Optimization with Conservative Estimation for Offline Safe Reinforcement LearningJiayi Guan, Guang Chen, Jiaming Ji, Long Yang et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 19 citations
- Predictable MDP Abstraction for Unsupervised Model-Based RLSeohong Park, Sergey LevineICML 2023 · 11 citations
- SHAPO: Sharpness-Aware Policy Optimization for Safe ExplorationKaustubh Mani, Yann Pequignot, Vincent Mai, Liam PaullICLR 2026 · 3 citations
- Solving Parameter-Robust Avoid Problems with Unknown Feasibility using Reinforcement LearningOswin So, Eric Yang Yu, Songyuan Zhang, Matthew Cleaveland et al.ICLR 2026 · 1 citation
- Safety Representations for Safer Policy LearningKaustubh Mani, Vincent Mai, Charlie Gauthier, Annie S. Chen et al.ICLR 2025
Builds on3
- Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement LearningAviral Kumar, Aurick Zhou, George Tucker, Sergey LevineNeurIPS 2020 · 2,881 citations
- MOPO: Model-based Offline Policy OptimizationTianhe Yu, Garrett Thomas, Lantao Yu, Stefano Ermon et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 989 citations
- MOReL: Model-Based Offline Reinforcement LearningRahul Kidambi, Aravind Rajeswaran, Praneeth Netrapalli, Thorsten JoachimsNeurIPS 2020 · 870 citations
Related papers
- Blending Neural Control Density Functions for Stabilization and SafetySahil Chaudhary, Chaitanya Murti, Chiranjib BhattacharyyaICML 2026
- LILAD: Learning In-context Lyapunov-stable Adaptive Dynamics ModelsAmit Jena, Na Li, Le XieAAAI 2026 · 1 citation
- Almost Surely Stable Deep DynamicsNathan P. Lawrence, Philip D. Loewen, Michael G. Forbes, Johan U. Backström et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 28 citations
- Learning Dynamics Models with Stable Invariant SetsNaoya Takeishi, Yoshinobu KawaharaAAAI 2021 · 21 citations
- Constrained Policy Optimization with Explicit Behavior Density For Offline Reinforcement LearningJing Zhang, Chi Zhang, Wenjia Wang, Bingyi JingNeurIPS 2023 · 19 citations
