Detecting Label Errors by Using Pre-Trained Language Models
Derek Chong, Jenny Hong, Christopher D. Manning
Abstract
We show that large pre-trained language models are inherently highly capable of identifying label errors in natural language datasets: simply examining out-of-sample data points in descending order of fine-tuned task loss significantly outperforms more complex error-detection mechanisms proposed in previous work. To this end, we contribute a novel method for introducing realistic, human-originated label noise into existing crowdsourced datasets such as SNLI and TweetNLP. We show that this noise has similar properties to real, hand-verified label errors, and is harder to detect than existing synthetic noise, creating challenges for model robustness.We argue that human-originated noise is a better standard for evaluation than synthetic noise. Finally, we use crowdsourced verification to evaluate the detection of real errors on IMDB, Amazon Reviews, and Recon, and confirm that pre-trained models perform at a 9–36% higher absolute Area Under the Precision-Recall Curve than existing models.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 2f950c21-9baa-4de1-abce-973da368612eCited by top-tier papers7
- Unmasking and Improving Data Credibility: A Study with Datasets for Training Harmless Language ModelsZhaowei Zhu, Jialu Wang, Hao Cheng, Yang LiuICLR 2024 · 30 citations
- Are LLMs Better than Reported? Detecting Label Errors and Mitigating Their Effect on Model PerformanceOmer Nahum, Nitay Calderon, Orgad Keller, Idan Szpektor et al.EMNLP 2025 · 9 citations
- NoiseBench: Benchmarking the Impact of Real Label Noise on Named Entity RecognitionElena Merdjanovska, Ansar Aynetdinov, Alan AkbikEMNLP 2024 · 5 citations
- Rethinking Evaluation for LLM Hallucination Detection: A Desiderata, A New RAG-based Benchmark, New InsightsWenbo Chen, Veena Padmanabhan, Tootiya Giyahchi, Elaine Wong et al.ACL 2026 · 1 citation
- Model Editing as a Robust and Denoised variant of DPO: A Case Study on ToxicityRheeya Uppaal, Apratim Dey, Yiting He, Yiqiao Zhong et al.ICLR 2025
Builds on7
- BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTTianyi Zhang, Varsha Kishore, Felix Wu, Kilian Q. Weinberger et al.ICLR 2020 · 8,443 citations
- Normalized Loss Functions for Deep Learning with Noisy LabelsXingjun Ma, Hanxun Huang, Yisen Wang, Simone Romano et al.ICML 2020 · 547 citations
- Learning with Noisy Labels Revisited: A Study Using Real-World Human AnnotationsJiaheng Wei, Zhaowei Zhu, Hao Cheng, Tongliang Liu et al.ICLR 2022 · 338 citations
- Peer Loss Functions: Learning from Noisy Labels without Knowing Noise RatesYang Liu, Hongyi GuoICML 2020 · 280 citations
- FINE Samples for Learning with Noisy LabelsTaehyeon Kim, Jongwoo Ko, Sangwook Cho, Jinhwan Choi et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 145 citations
Related papers
- LEMoN: Label Error Detection using Multimodal NeighborsHaoran Zhang, Aparna Balagopalan, Nassim Oufattole, Hyewon Jeong et al.ICML 2025
- VariErr NLI: Separating Annotation Error from Human Label VariationLeon Weber-Genzel, Siyao Peng, Marie-Catherine de Marneffe, Barbara PlankACL 2024
- New Protocols and Negative Results for Textual Entailment Data CollectionSamuel R. Bowman, Jennimaria Palomaki, Livio Baldini Soares, Emily PitlerEMNLP 2020 · 3 citations
- Understanding and Mitigating the Label Noise in Pre-training on Downstream TasksHao Chen, Jindong Wang, Ankit Shah, Ran Tao et al.ICLR 2024 · 49 citations
- Analysing the Noise Model Error for Realistic Noisy Label DataMichael A. Hedderich, Dawei Zhu, Dietrich KlakowAAAI 2021 · 26 citations
