POSE: Practical Off-chain Smart Contract Execution
Tommaso Frassetto, Patrick Jauernig, David Koisser, David Kretzler, Benjamin Schlosser, Sebastian Faust, Ahmad-Reza Sadeghi
Abstract
Smart contracts enable users to execute payments depending on complex program logic. Ethereum is the most notable example of a blockchain that supports smart contracts leveraged for countless applications including games, auctions and financial products. Unfortunately, the traditional method of running contract code on-chain is very expensive, for instance, on the Ethereum platform, fees have dramatically increased, rendering the system unsuitable for complex applications. A prominent solution to address this problem is to execute code off-chain and only use the blockchain as a trust anchor. While there has been significant progress in developing off-chain systems over the last years, current off-chain solutions suffer from various drawbacks including costly blockchain interactions, lack of data privacy, huge capital costs from locked collateral, or supporting only a restricted set of applications. In this paper, we present POSE -- a practical off-chain protocol for smart contracts that addresses the aforementioned shortcomings of existing solutions. POSE leverages a pool of Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs) to execute the computation efficiently and to swiftly recover from accidental or malicious failures. We show that POSE provides strong security guarantees even if a large subset of parties is corrupted. We evaluate our proof-of-concept implementation with respect to its efficiency and effectiveness.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 2f88d2ec-74e6-4d42-ac8f-d02ab8da8888Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on15
- Town Crier: An Authenticated Data Feed for Smart ContractsFan Zhang, Ethan Cecchetti, Kyle Croman, Ari Juels et al.CCS 2016 · 668 citations
- Sanctum: Minimal Hardware Extensions for Strong Software IsolationVictor Costan, Ilia A. Lebedev, Srinivas DevadasUSENIX Security 2016 · 649 citations
- ARMageddon: Cache Attacks on Mobile DevicesMoritz Lipp, Daniel Gruss, Raphael Spreitzer, Clémentine Maurice et al.USENIX Security 2016 · 451 citations
- Arbitrum: Scalable, private smart contractsHarry A. Kalodner, Steven Goldfeder, Xiaoqi Chen, S. Matthew Weinberg et al.USENIX Security 2018 · 353 citations
- Chainspace: A Sharded Smart Contracts PlatformMustafa Al-Bassam, Alberto Sonnino, Shehar Bano, Dave Hrycyszyn et al.NDSS 2018 · 313 citations
Related papers
- ACE: Asynchronous and Concurrent Execution of Complex Smart ContractsKarl Wüst, Sinisa Matetic, Silvan Egli, Kari Kostiainen et al.CCS 2020 · 12 citations
- Bitcontracts: Supporting Smart Contracts in Legacy BlockchainsKarl Wüst, Loris Diana, Kari Kostiainen, Ghassan Karame et al.NDSS 2021
- FastKitten: Practical Smart Contracts on BitcoinPoulami Das, Lisa Eckey, Tommaso Frassetto, David Gens et al.USENIX Security 2019 · 118 citations
- LightCross: Sharding with Lightweight Cross-Shard Execution for Smart ContractsXiaodong Qi, Yi LiINFOCOM 2024 · 22 citations
- SmartPool: Practical Decentralized Pooled MiningLoi Luu, Yaron Velner, Jason Teutsch, Prateek SaxenaUSENIX Security 2017 · 144 citations
