Graph Contrastive Invariant Learning from the Causal Perspective
Yanhu Mo, Xiao Wang, Shaohua Fan, Chuan Shi
Abstract
Graph contrastive learning (GCL), learning the node representation by contrasting two augmented graphs in a self-supervised way, has attracted considerable attention. GCL is usually believed to learn the invariant representation. However, does this understanding always hold in practice? In this paper, we first study GCL from the perspective of causality. By analyzing GCL with the structural causal model (SCM), we discover that traditional GCL may not well learn the invariant representations due to the non-causal information contained in the graph. How can we fix it and encourage the current GCL to learn better invariant representations? The SCM offers two requirements and motives us to propose a novel GCL method. Particularly, we introduce the spectral graph augmentation to simulate the intervention upon non-causal factors. Then we design the invariance objective and independence objective to better capture the causal factors. Specifically, (i) the invariance objective encourages the encoder to capture the invariant information contained in causal variables, and (ii) the independence objective aims to reduce the influence of confounders on the causal variables. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach on node classification tasks.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 2f4dfbd8-4335-4dc3-ba81-9caae801291cCited by top-tier papers6
- FedIGL: Federated Invariant Graph Learning for Non-IID GraphsLingren Wang, Wenxuan Tu, Jiaxin Wang, Xiong Wang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
- Transferable Graph Condensation from the Causal PerspectiveHuaming Du, Yijie Huang, Su Yao, Yiying Wang et al.AAAI 2026
- Cognitive Bifurcation: Dual-Progressive Causal Diffusion with Hippocampal Memory for Continual Graph LearningJiahao Liang, Carl Yang, Haoran Yang, Zhiwen Yu et al.KDD 2026
- CL-GCL: Comprehensive and Lightweight Graph Contrastive LearningJianqing Liang, Xinkai Wei, Zhiqiang LiICML 2026
- From Distribution to Geometry: Stable Graph Generalization via Invariant BarycentersHangyuan Du, Rong Wang, Weihong Zhang, Lu Bai et al.ICML 2026
Builds on15
- A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual RepresentationsTing Chen, Simon Kornblith, Mohammad Norouzi, Geoffrey E. HintonICML 2020 · 24,064 citations
- Contrastive Multi-View Representation Learning on GraphsKaveh Hassani, Amir Hosein Khas AhmadiICML 2020 · 1,663 citations
- Graph Contrastive Learning with Adaptive AugmentationYanqiao Zhu, Yichen Xu, Feng Yu, Qiang Liu et al.WWW 2021 · 1,415 citations
- GCC: Graph Contrastive Coding for Graph Neural Network Pre-TrainingJiezhong Qiu, Qibin Chen, Yuxiao Dong, Jing Zhang et al.KDD 2020 · 755 citations
- Causal Intervention for Weakly-Supervised Semantic SegmentationDong Zhang, Hanwang Zhang, Jinhui Tang, Xian-Sheng Hua et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 563 citations
Related papers
- Spectral Augmentation for Self-Supervised Learning on GraphsLu Lin, Jinghui Chen, Hongning WangICLR 2023 · 16 citations
- Revisiting Graph Contrastive Learning from the Perspective of Graph SpectrumNian Liu, Xiao Wang, Deyu Bo, Chuan Shi et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 102 citations
- Conditional Distribution Learning for Graph ClassificationJie Chen, Hua Mao, Chuanbin Liu, Zhu Wang et al.AAAI 2026
- Rethinking Dimensional Rationale in Graph Contrastive Learning from Causal PerspectiveQirui Ji, Jiangmeng Li, Jie Hu, Rui Wang et al.AAAI 2024 · 24 citations
- Interventional Contrastive Learning with Meta Semantic RegularizerWenwen Qiang, Jiangmeng Li, Changwen Zheng, Bing Su et al.ICML 2022 · 25 citations
