Spectral Reach: Understanding Neural Scaling as Progress into the Spectral Tail
Konstantin Nikolaou, Jonas Scheunemann, Sven Krippendorf, Samuel Tovey, Christian Holm
Abstract
Neural scaling laws describe predictable power-law relationships between model size, dataset size, compute, and performance. While these laws guide the development of modern foundation models, the mechanisms underpinning them remain poorly understood, in part due to the absence of scalable analysis tools. To close this gap, we introduce spectral position : a scalable measure of which eigenvalues of the empirical neural tangent kernel (eNTK) currently drive loss reduction. Applying this measure to scaling experiments, we find that spectral position decreases throughout training: learning shifts from dominant eigenmodes into the spectral tail. Larger models reach further into the tail than smaller models, revealing a size-dependent capacity we call spectral reach . This suggests why larger models achieve lower losses: they sustain learning on weak spectral signals inaccessible to smaller models. We further identify feature learning as a key enabler of spectral reach. It adaptively amplifies gradient magnitudes as learning advances, sustaining progress where frozen representations stall. This points to concrete interventions through architecture and optimizer design.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 2f47be44-42a7-4bde-adac-f58ff5a06a4bBuilds on19
- An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at ScaleAlexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn et al.ICLR 2021 · 21,477 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Deep Learning with Differential PrivacyMartín Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian J. Goodfellow, H. Brendan McMahan et al.CCS 2016 · 7,620 citations
- Deep learning versus kernel learning: an empirical study of loss landscape geometry and the time evolution of the Neural Tangent KernelStanislav Fort, Gintare Karolina Dziugaite, Mansheej Paul, Sepideh Kharaghani et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 255 citations
- Neural Tangents: Fast and Easy Infinite Neural Networks in PythonRoman Novak, Lechao Xiao, Jiri Hron, Jaehoon Lee et al.ICLR 2020 · 254 citations
Related papers
- Super Consistency of Neural Network Landscapes and Learning Rate TransferLorenzo Noci, Alexandru Meterez, Thomas Hofmann, Antonio OrvietoNeurIPS 2024 · 25 citations
- How Feature Learning Can Improve Neural Scaling LawsBlake Bordelon, Alexander B. Atanasov, Cengiz PehlevanICLR 2025 · 2 citations
- The Quantization Model of Neural ScalingEric J. Michaud, Ziming Liu, Uzay Girit, Max TegmarkNeurIPS 2023 · 179 citations
- Superposition Yields Robust Neural ScalingYizhou Liu, Ziming Liu, Jeff GoreNeurIPS 2025 · 36 citations
- Spectral Evolution and Invariance in Linear-width Neural NetworksZhichao Wang, Andrew Engel, Anand D. Sarwate, Ioana Dumitriu et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 33 citations
