Tactical Optimism and Pessimism for Deep Reinforcement Learning
Ted Moskovitz, Jack Parker-Holder, Aldo Pacchiano, Michael Arbel, Michael I. Jordan
Abstract
In recent years, deep off-policy actor-critic algorithms have become a dominant approach to reinforcement learning for continuous control. One of the primary drivers of this improved performance is the use of pessimistic value updates to address function approximation errors, which previously led to disappointing performance. However, a direct consequence of pessimism is reduced exploration, running counter to theoretical support for the efficacy of optimism in the face of uncertainty. So which approach is best? In this work, we show that the most effective degree of optimism can vary both across tasks and over the course of learning. Inspired by this insight, we introduce a novel deep actor-critic framework, Tactical Optimistic and Pessimistic (TOP) estimation, which switches between optimistic and pessimistic value learning online. This is achieved by formulating the selection as a multi-arm bandit problem. We show in a series of continuous control tasks that TOP outperforms existing methods which rely on a fixed degree of optimism, setting a new state of the art in challenging pixel-based environments. Since our changes are simple to implement, we believe these insights can easily be incorporated into a multitude of off-policy algorithms.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 2f473f58-3973-4970-afa4-46598e6a164aCited by top-tier papers27
- Bigger, Regularized, Optimistic: scaling for compute and sample efficient continuous controlMichal Nauman, Mateusz Ostaszewski, Krzysztof Jankowski, Piotr Milos et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 119 citations
- Overestimation, Overfitting, and Plasticity in Actor-Critic: the Bitter Lesson of Reinforcement LearningMichal Nauman, Michal Bortkiewicz, Piotr Milos, Tomasz Trzcinski et al.ICML 2024 · 46 citations
- Stabilizing Off-Policy Deep Reinforcement Learning from PixelsEdoardo Cetin, Philip J. Ball, Stephen J. Roberts, Oya ÇeliktutanICML 2022 · 43 citations
- Towards Deployment-Efficient Reinforcement Learning: Lower Bound and OptimalityJiawei Huang, Jinglin Chen, Li Zhao, Tao Qin et al.ICLR 2022 · 32 citations
- Learning Pessimism for Reinforcement LearningEdoardo Cetin, Oya ÇeliktutanAAAI 2023 · 30 citations
Builds on16
- Dream to Control: Learning Behaviors by Latent ImaginationDanijar Hafner, Timothy P. Lillicrap, Jimmy Ba, Mohammad NorouziICLR 2020 · 1,852 citations
- CURL: Contrastive Unsupervised Representations for Reinforcement LearningMichael Laskin, Aravind Srinivas, Pieter AbbeelICML 2020 · 1,261 citations
- Image Augmentation Is All You Need: Regularizing Deep Reinforcement Learning from PixelsDenis Yarats, Ilya Kostrikov, Rob FergusICLR 2021 · 911 citations
- Reinforcement Learning with Augmented DataMichael Laskin, Kimin Lee, Adam Stooke, Lerrel Pinto et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 833 citations
- Agent57: Outperforming the Atari Human BenchmarkAdrià Puigdomènech Badia, Bilal Piot, Steven Kapturowski, Pablo Sprechmann et al.ICML 2020 · 584 citations
Related papers
- Adversarially Trained Actor Critic for Offline Reinforcement LearningChing-An Cheng, Tengyang Xie, Nan Jiang, Alekh AgarwalICML 2022 · 156 citations
- Policy Optimization as Online Learning with Mediator FeedbackAlberto Maria Metelli, Matteo Papini, Pierluca D'Oro, Marcello RestelliAAAI 2021 · 11 citations
- Seizing Serendipity: Exploiting the Value of Past Success in Off-Policy Actor-CriticTianying Ji, Yu Luo, Fuchun Sun, Xianyuan Zhan et al.ICML 2024 · 23 citations
- Efficient Exploration via Epistemic-Risk-Seeking Policy OptimizationBrendan O'DonoghueICML 2023 · 11 citations
- Actor-Critics Can Achieve Optimal Sample EfficiencyKevin Tan, Wei Fan, Yuting WeiICML 2025
