Clotho: Measuring Task-Specific Pre-Generation Test Adequacy for LLM Inputs
Juyeon Yoon, Somin Kim, Robert Feldt, Shin Yoo
Abstract
Software increasingly relies on the emergent capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs), from natural language understanding to program analysis and generation. Yet testing them on specific tasks remains difficult and costly: many prompts lack ground truths, forcing reliance on human judgments, while existing test adequacy measures typically rely on output uncertainty and thus are only available after full inference. A key challenge is to assess how useful a test input is in a way that reflects the demands of the task, ideally before even generating any output. We introduce Clotho, a task-specific, pre-generation test adequacy measure that estimates input difficulty directly from LLM hidden states. Given a large pool of unlabelled inputs for a specific task, Clotho uses a Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) to adaptively sample the most informative cases for human labelling. Based on this reference set the GMM can then rank unseen inputs by their likelihood of failure. In our empirical evaluation across eight benchmark tasks and three open-weight LLMs, Clotho can predict failures with a ROC-AUC of 0.716, after labelling reference sets that are on average only 5.4% of inputs. It does so without generating any outputs, thereby significantly reducing LLM execution costs compared to output-based uncertainty or confidence measures. Comparison of Clotho and these post-generation adequacy measures shows that the two approaches complement each other. Crucially, we show that adequacy scores learnt from open-weight LLMs transfer effectively to proprietary models, extending the applicability of the approach. When prioritising test inputs for proprietary models, Clotho increases the average number of failing inputs from 18.7 to 42.5 out of 100, compared to random prioritisation.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 2edc7c8d-c182-4574-836f-d866899c425dBuilds on12
- Deberta: decoding-Enhanced Bert with Disentangled AttentionPengcheng He, Xiaodong Liu, Jianfeng Gao, Weizhu ChenICLR 2021 · 3,729 citations
- SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software EngineeringJohn Yang, Carlos E. Jimenez, Alexander Wettig, Kilian Lieret et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 2,059 citations
- Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language ModelsXuezhi Wang, Jason Wei, Dale Schuurmans, Quoc V. Le et al.ICLR 2023 · 681 citations
- SelfCheckGPT: Zero-Resource Black-Box Hallucination Detection for Generative Large Language ModelsPotsawee Manakul, Adian Liusie, Mark J. F. GalesEMNLP 2023 · 331 citations
- INSIDE: LLMs' Internal States Retain the Power of Hallucination DetectionChao Chen, Kai Liu, Ze Chen, Yi Gu et al.ICLR 2024 · 281 citations
Related papers
- The LLM Already Knows: Estimating LLM-Perceived Question Difficulty via Hidden RepresentationsYubo Zhu, Dongrui Liu, Zecheng Lin, Wei Tong et al.EMNLP 2025 · 1 citation
- Oracle-Guided Program Selection from Large Language ModelsZhiyu Fan, Haifeng Ruan, Sergey Mechtaev, Abhik RoychoudhuryISSTA 2024 · 4 citations
- TACO: Trust Assessment of Large Language Models in Coding Assistance TasksShihao Weng, Yang Feng, Jincheng Li, Yining Yin et al.ICSE 2026
- How efficient is LLM-generated code? A rigorous & high-standard benchmarkRuizhong Qiu, Weiliang Will Zeng, James Ezick, Christopher Lott et al.ICLR 2025
- On LLMs’ Internal Representation of Code CorrectnessFrancisco Ribeiro, Claudio Spiess, Premkumar Devanbu, Sarah NadiICSE 2026
