On the Interplay between Graph Structure and Learning Algorithms in Graph Neural Networks
Junwei Su, Chuan Wu
Abstract
This paper studies the interplay between learning algorithms and graph structure for graph neural networks (GNNs). Existing theoretical studies on the learning dynamics of GNNs primarily focus on the convergence rates of learning algorithms under the interpolation regime (noise-free) and offer only a crude connection between these dynamics and the actual graph structure (e.g., maximum degree). This paper aims to bridge this gap by investigating the excessive risk (generalization performance) of learning algorithms in GNNs within the generalization regime (with noise). Specifically, we extend the conventional settings from the learning theory literature to the context of GNNs and examine how graph structure influences the performance of learning algorithms such as stochastic gradient descent (SGD) and Ridge regression. Our study makes several key contributions toward understanding the interplay between graph structure and learning in GNNs. First, we derive the excess risk profiles of SGD and Ridge regression in GNNs and connect these profiles to the graph structure through spectral graph theory. With this established framework, we further explore how different graph structures (regular vs. power-law) impact the performance of these algorithms through comparative analysis. Additionally, we extend our analysis to multi-layer linear GNNs, revealing an increasing non-isotropic effect on the excess risk profile, thereby offering new insights into the over-smoothing issue in GNNs from the perspective of learning algorithms. Our empirical results align with our theoretical predictions, collectively showcasing a coupling relation among graph structure, GNNs and learning algorithms, and providing insights on GNN
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 2ebc1276-3d7e-482e-a1eb-b4240d28c59bCited by top-tier papers2
- Full-Graph vs. Mini-Batch Training: Comprehensive Analysis from a Batch Size and Fan-Out Size PerspectiveMengfan Liu, Da Zheng, Junwei Su, Chuan WuICLR 2026 · 2 citations
- Smoothness Errors in Dynamics Models and How to Avoid ThemEdward Berman, Luisa Li, Jung Yeon Park, Robin WaltersICML 2026
Builds on16
- Understanding over-squashing and bottlenecks on graphs via curvatureJake Topping, Francesco Di Giovanni, Benjamin Paul Chamberlain, Xiaowen Dong et al.ICLR 2022 · 628 citations
- Handling Distribution Shifts on Graphs: An Invariance PerspectiveQitian Wu, Hengrui Zhang, Junchi Yan, David WipfICLR 2022 · 261 citations
- Shift-Robust GNNs: Overcoming the Limitations of Localized Graph Training dataQi Zhu, Natalia Ponomareva, Jiawei Han, Bryan PerozziNeurIPS 2021 · 152 citations
- On the Optimal Weighted Regularization in Overparameterized Linear RegressionDenny Wu, Ji XuNeurIPS 2020 · 151 citations
- A PAC-Bayesian Approach to Generalization Bounds for Graph Neural NetworksRenjie Liao, Raquel Urtasun, Richard S. ZemelICLR 2021 · 109 citations
Related papers
- Graph Neural Networks Use Graphs When They Shouldn'tMaya Bechler-Speicher, Ido Amos, Ran Gilad-Bachrach, Amir GlobersonICML 2024 · 27 citations
- Graph Neural Networks Exponentially Lose Expressive Power for Node ClassificationKenta Oono, Taiji SuzukiICLR 2020 · 864 citations
- Generalization Error of Graph Neural Networks in the Mean-field RegimeGholamali Aminian, Yixuan He, Gesine Reinert, Lukasz Szpruch et al.ICML 2024 · 4 citations
- Measuring and Relieving the Over-Smoothing Problem for Graph Neural Networks from the Topological ViewDeli Chen, Yankai Lin, Wei Li, Peng Li et al.AAAI 2020 · 1,353 citations
- Benefit of deep learning with non-convex noisy gradient descent: Provable excess risk bound and superiority to kernel methodsTaiji Suzuki, Shunta AkiyamaICLR 2021 · 12 citations
