Between Stochastic and Adversarial Online Convex Optimization: Improved Regret Bounds via Smoothness
Sarah Sachs, Hédi Hadiji, Tim van Erven, Cristóbal Guzmán
Abstract
Stochastic and adversarial data are two widely studied settings in online learning. But many optimization tasks are neither i.i.d. nor fully adversarial, which makes it of fundamental interest to get a better theoretical understanding of the world between these extremes. In this work we establish novel regret bounds for online convex optimization in a setting that interpolates between stochastic i.i.d. and fully adversarial losses. By exploiting smoothness of the expected losses, these bounds replace a dependence on the maximum gradient length by the variance of the gradients, which was previously known only for linear losses. In addition, they weaken the i.i.d. assumption by allowing, for example, adversarially poisoned rounds, which were previously considered in the expert and bandit setting. Our results extend this to the online convex optimization framework. In the fully i.i.d. case, our bounds match the rates one would expect from results in stochastic acceleration, and in the fully adversarial case they gracefully deteriorate to match the minimax regret. We further provide lower bounds showing that our regret upper bounds are tight for all intermediate regimes in terms of the stochastic variance and the adversarial variation of the loss gradients.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 2e773e90-26c4-4be7-88e9-75fb65c3d73fCited by top-tier papers12
- Optimal Stochastic Non-smooth Non-convex Optimization through Online-to-Non-convex ConversionAshok Cutkosky, Harsh Mehta, Francesco OrabonaICML 2023 · 54 citations
- Optimistic Online Mirror Descent for Bridging Stochastic and Adversarial Online Convex OptimizationSijia Chen, Wei-Wei Tu, Peng Zhao, Lijun ZhangICML 2023 · 33 citations
- Universal Online Learning with Gradient Variations: A Multi-layer Online Ensemble ApproachYu-Hu Yan, Peng Zhao, Zhi-Hua ZhouNeurIPS 2023 · 16 citations
- Gradient-Variation Online Learning under Generalized SmoothnessYan-Feng Xie, Peng Zhao, Zhi-Hua ZhouNeurIPS 2024 · 14 citations
- A Simple and Optimal Approach for Universal Online Learning with Gradient VariationsYu-Hu Yan, Peng Zhao, Zhi-Hua ZhouNeurIPS 2024 · 9 citations
Builds on4
- Dynamic Regret of Convex and Smooth FunctionsPeng Zhao, Yu-Jie Zhang, Lijun Zhang, Zhi-Hua ZhouNeurIPS 2020 · 136 citations
- Prediction with Corrupted Expert AdviceIdan Amir, Idan Attias, Tomer Koren, Yishay Mansour et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 49 citations
- On Optimal Robustness to Adversarial Corruption in Online Decision ProblemsShinji ItoNeurIPS 2021 · 28 citations
- Smoothed Analysis with Adaptive AdversariesNika Haghtalab, Tim Roughgarden, Abhishek ShettyFOCS 2021 · 4 citations
Related papers
- Online Convex Optimization in the Random Order ModelDan Garber, Gal Korcia, Kfir Y. LevyICML 2020 · 12 citations
- Fast Rates in Stochastic Online Convex Optimization by Exploiting the Curvature of Feasible SetsTaira Tsuchiya, Shinji ItoNeurIPS 2024 · 2 citations
- A new regret analysis for Adam-type algorithmsAhmet Alacaoglu, Yura Malitsky, Panayotis Mertikopoulos, Volkan CevherICML 2020 · 50 citations
- Online Frank-Wolfe with Arbitrary DelaysYuanyu Wan, Wei-Wei Tu, Lijun ZhangNeurIPS 2022 · 16 citations
- Federated Online and Bandit Convex OptimizationKumar Kshitij Patel, Lingxiao Wang, Aadirupa Saha, Nathan SrebroICML 2023 · 12 citations
